I am sorry, but this looks like nitpicking now. If something is inline with commonly known/available information (which seems to be case here for those who lived in those times), the burden of proof is on the one providing the opinion to the contrary. Yes, there can be many shades of opinions and different sides to a story. But not one person has come out providing any opinion to the contrary of what RaviSri had written about (the other) Dhanammal here and several have spoken supporting his assertion, some based on personal experience. Given all this, your continued persistence does come across as more personal and trivial than as a genuine quest for truth.Ranganayaki wrote:Hold on, i take some of it back.
"RaviSri": protege of Ariyakkudi who, unfortunately and according to common consensus, a very mediocre singer.
Also, this is way off the original topic and I kindly request this be taken offline. In the interest of keeping this thread on track and not create a war of words, this will be my first and last post related to this sub-issue. Let the orignal topic not get side tracked because of this.