Cool,
A mere bahchA, compared to some of us here.If we say we are thirty, you are a teen.
Have a happy year! Hope you keep us happy too, with your quotes, anecdotes and musical gifts...
your reply should have been to bilahari, who doubted your claim of your age.
i wasn't surprised and doubtful why your age had to be beyond 30. your zeal and enthusiasm are such. your sense of commitment in addition has caused lot of stomach ulcers in sedentary people like me!
No offense, my reference was purely to literal age which is what one generally celebrates on birthdays! If enthusiasm is considered, your figurative age would not cross 20s!
I also agree with chalanata that sri TKB should not deign to provide a serious response to a poster who has basically registered to singularly bash the keyboard and Sathya.
I think Malini Iyengar's post is welcome. Her opinion too is but probably could have been couched in more polite language.
The funny part about this whole idea of criticising the keyboard and highlighting its deficiencies is that, other than arunk several months ago, no one has pointed out a specific flaw. I am not saying that arunk is right or wrong. I am not qualified to comment on such intricate detail. But none of the others - including pavithrac71 from another thread - could substantiate their claims of the unnatural gamakas with any fact. For that matter, I am not even sure if these people have heard any of the uploads done by Sathya's dad.
Don't you think that throwing mud at random hoping that some of it will stick is more a reflection of your baser intents than any attempt to actually "discuss" issues with the keyboard? I have been asking the knowledgeable amongst our forum members to comment on the quality of gamakas produced on the keyboard but it appears to not have any takers. Why?