Ashwin wrote:SRJ Mama believes that rUpamu jUci is a composition of rAmasvAmi dIkShitar and not MD. Im not sure about nI sATi...
Ashwin
Hi Ashwin,
That is very interesting! There is a lecdem by SRJ Mama on Dikshitar compositions (from around 1993) where he mentions more than once that rUpamu jUci is a composition of muttusvAmi dIkshitar. Possibly, Mama formed the opinion that you mention at a later time? If at all possible, I am curious to know what motivated Mama to change his opinion.
The lecdem is available here:
http://www.sangeethapriya.org/Downloads ... rt1of2.MP3 and here are the verbatim quotes from the lecdem where (I think) at Mama mentions this (implicitly or explicitly):
15:04 "rUpamu jUci, tOdi rAga, Adi tALa. In sangIta sampradAya pradarshini, it has been given as a composition of muddusvAmi dIkshitar. But, shall I say unfortunately, in later publications, it has been labeled as a composition of Subbarama Dikshitar."
15:58 "rUpamu jUci has been given as a composition of muddusvAmi dikShitar, a cauka varNa."
27:53 (after concluding a rendition of rUpamu jUci): "This is the typical dIkShitar style. dIkShitar, muttusvAmi dIkShitar, was predominantly a cauka kAla composer..."
31:48 (Still talking about rUpamu jUCi and briefly changing the subject to rAmasvAmi dIkStar's hindOLavasanta varNa): "Perhaps the son [muttusvAmi dIkshitar] followed the father [rAmasvAmi dIkshitar]."
32:00 "It's also handed down to us through the Tanjore Quartet descendants that muttusvAmi dIkshitar just confined himself only to this one cauka varNa [rUpamu] ..."
32:50 "That's why we are having only this one varNa, this rUpamu jUci, of muttusvAmi dIkshitar."
Also, I definitely remember a lecdem by DKJ where DKJ similarly mentions nI sATi as an MD composition.
Hi ksrimech,
ksrimech wrote:Isn't there also a story about different people actually laying hands on that tODi varNam (muttusvAmi dIkSitar, bAlusvAmi dIkSitar, subburAya SAStri and SyAmA SAStri) after they found only chitta swaras were missing after rAmasvAmi dIkSitar's death?
No, this is not a varNam in tOdi but in shrIranjanI (sAmi ninnE), AFAIK. The charaNa svara-s were composed respectively by shyAma shAstri, chinnasvAmi dIkshitar, and muttusvAmi dIkshitar. This is mentioned in the SSP as a footnote to this varNam's notation. Lalita Ramakrishna also mentions this in her book "The Varnam", and perhaps, this story is mentioned there.
ksrimech wrote:... the telugu/tamizh/maNipravALa kritis/varNas do not have the same musical quality or beauty lyrical as the sanskrit kritis.
About the musical quality, can you point out any objective differences, or is it just a subjective feeling? And how can you expect lyrical similarities between Telugu varNams and Sanskrit kritis? As a case in point, I don't see very many lyrical similarities between Poochi Iyengar's Telugu varNams and Sanskrit kriti "shrI venkaTEsham", or for that matter, between Lalgudi Jayaraman's Telugu varNams and Sanskrit kritis. I fail to see how the lyrical beauty argument can carry any weight.
Of course, if it is your personal, subjective opinion, you are definitely entitled to it.
Also, for the record, other people in the Dikshitar family have composed prolifically in Telugu (RD, SD, and also possibly chinnasvAmi).
Best wishes,
Ganesh