NSG in Singapore on 23rd Aug 2009

Review the latest concerts you have listened to.
Post Reply
bilahari
Posts: 2631
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 09:02

Post by bilahari »

Neyveli Santhanagopalan - Vocal
TR Vijaykumar - Violin
V Raghuraman - Mrudangam
S Selvapandian - Khanjira

Duration: 2 h 30 min

Approximate Songlist:

01. inta calamu (varNam) [S @ charaNam] - bEgaDa - Adi
02. mEru samAna - mAyAmALavagowLa - Adi
03. palukavEmi [Sketch, S @ pallavi] - pUrNacandrika - Adi

04. sankari sankuru [R, N @ syAma kriSNa sOdari, S] - sAvEri - Adi (tiSra gati)
05. amba yeninE moralida - aTANa - Adi - Ponniah Pillai
06. vANanai madicUDiya (dEvAram) [R, N @ vIranai viDamunDanai (?), S, T] - kIravANi - miSra cApu

07. nADupai balikEru - madhyamAvati - khaNDa cApu
08. Sketch Thanam Pallavi - suruTTi - miSra jhampai [2 kaLai] (eDuppu samam + 1)
Pallavi: gaNanAdanai manavEdanai tIravE nI ninai iha para sukham tarum (gaNanAdanai...)
Ragamaliga swaras in sahAna, rItigowLa, kApi.
09. druvad thillAna (ni ri ni ri ga ma ga ri sa) - pUrvi - rUpakam
10. nI nAma (mangaLam) - sowrAStram - Adi

Sri NSG and his team presented an enjoyable concert last evening. The bEgaDa varnam was presented well in two speeds, and the subsequent burst of swaras were well-executed with NSG using the janTa sequences of RR GG MM very well in both madhya and tara sthayis. While mEru samAna was presented well, I felt an alapanai or some neraval and swaras might have lifted the presentation further, almost because I have never heard this composition presented alone. NSG's sketch of pUrNacandrika was right on the money with an emphasis on RGMRS phrases. PalukavEmi was sung nicely in an MMI-ish gait, but the swaras suffixed to the composition were too brief to make much of an impact. NSG then started a sAvEri alapanai, which was very succinct, with all the classical gamakas on the madhyamam to give the full sAvEri effect, and his juxtaposition of the rishabam and dhaivatham by singing them alternatively in the alapanai was very aesthetic (e.g. RR,,,, DD,,,,). He concluded his ragam with some thanam patterns in the mandra sthayi which were excellent. Shyama Shastri's composition was sung in a very emotive manner, and the neraval at syAma kriSNa sOdari was rendered in two speeds, with a nice use of tail flourishes like a super-fast SRMPDS at the end of an avarthanam of neraval, and the mEl kAla neraval was rendered with a typically excellent grip over kala pramanam in thanam style. The kalpana swaras were dominated by mathematical exercises which were a little much for me and seemed to detract from the beauty of sAvEri. I think he could've chosen to sing more elaborate swaras in first speed before indulging in kaNakku. Of course, a vocalist is free to sing as he pleases, but I'm not one for excessive kaNakku (mostly because I don't really understand it :) , but also because it's not as effective as sarvalaghu in demonstrating the raga bhavam).

Ponniah Pillai's aTANa composition was a lovely filler before the main item, and NSG sang the atANa nishadam with excellent shruti shuddam, fleshing out the beauty of the composition and the raga very well. NSG was specifically asked by the organizers to sing kIravANi, which is as much his raga as kharaharapriya was SSI's or kAmbOji was MMI's, and I certainly wasn't complaining. Every time NSG takes up kIravANi, he seems to uncover some long-buried nuances, and manages to sculpt a different figure of the raga, and the kIravANi he presented last evening was truly a gem. NSG's alapanai was quite imaginative with phrases like SM,,, SP,,, SD,,, , exploiting the inherent beauty of the scale itself. He sang long, beautiful karvais at panchamam and tara shadjam, with a lovely S, (R,GRS) N D P, D N S.... leading up to the tara shadjam. In the tara sthayi, however, both NSG and the violinist seemed to brush bhairavi a bit much for my comfort (especially around tara rishabam). NSG made good use of the madhyamam, singing an extraordinary RGM,,GR with a gorgeous jaru to the ma. Thirunavukarasar's dEvaram was sung brilliantly by NSG, with an outstanding neraval which was mostly in vilamba kalam, where NSG gave a lot of MMI-esque touches with thoroughly exploring merely the word "vIranai" and punctuating his neraval with ample moments of silence to allow the rasikas to absorb his music as he himself seemed thoroughly dissolved in it. There was definitely quite some magic in that neraval, with some imaginative moments as well as NSG sang neraval with just alternating N R - N R phrases (which the violinist returned as R N - R N, which offered a pleasing contrast). The swara prastharam was very creative as well, with NSG singing sequences like MN NM MN(mandra), with great emphasis on the power of flat notes in kIravANi, and then proceded to sing some nice patterns like P,DN M,PD G,MP and M,PDN, G,MPD, R,GMP, , demonstrating how judicious use of dattu sequences can bring out the melody of kIravANi. He continued this display with other noteworthy patterns like SS SS(tara) NDPMGRS; RR RR(tara) SNDPMGR; GG GG(tara) RSNDPMG, etc.

NSG presented a special pallavi dedicated to vinAyakar on vinAyakar chaturti day. The sketch of the ragam and the whole exercise was unsatisfyingly brief (~17 min total), with the highlight being a crisp thanam in suruTTi, a ragam that isn't often taken up for RTP or thanam singing. The pallavi was beautiful and NSG sang a largely mEl kAla neraval before taking up swaras and of course, ragamaliga swaras. Singing sahAna right after suruTTi might not have been a wise decision, with the nishadam adopting a suruTTi-like character especially in RNDP type phrases with which he commenced the sahAna swaras. Only one or two avarthanas of each ragam were sung, and rItigowLa was really too brief. I definitely think the RTP should've have been sung in a far more elaborate manner, or at the least the pallavi itself, since it was a dedication to vinAyakar, or NSG could've opted to sing a ragamaliga slokam about vinAyakar instead, which would've been a better use of 17 minutes. To make up for the blip, NSG sang the pUrvi thillana popularised by MDR and KVN which was composed by the violinist Sri Vijaykumar's grandfather. NSG sang the thillana in vilamba kalam, and it was quite extraordinary, and he sang the sahitya line with each swaram named with great finesse, reminiscent of MDR.

All in all, NSG wisely refrained from singing too many phrases in the tara sthayi, given his customary difficulty with this octave, and as a result the concert was a commanding display of his strengths--replete with sowkhyam, beautiful neravals, soulful krithi renditions, vilamba kala singing, and overflowing manOdharma. Of course, the concert had its weaknesses, like the all-too-brief RTP, and NSG's struggle on occasion with shruti while singing brigha sangathis, and what I thought was an overindulgence in kaNakku in the sAvEri kalpanaswaras. But as rasikas came up to NSG after the concert, one lady summed up what I think is NSG's USP, remarking that the concert felt like it had been sung at home. It is indeed the intimacy and warmth of our vidyArthi's music that time after time, country after country, draws me and probably several others to his music more than anything else.

The violinist, TR Vijaykumar, is a sishya of LGJ, though his technique with an even, strong bow (as opposed to the LGJ school which seems to emphasise modulation of bowing strength to closely mimic the vallinam and mellinam of vocal music), and his handling of brighas all seemed to suggest his style was an amalgam of several others, and most closely allied with that of Ganesh-Kumaresh. TR Vijaykumar provided capable support on the violin, returning brigha sangathis with precision in alapanai, playing appropriate neraval responses, and returned some of NSG's imaginative patterns with great accuracy. All the while, he kept himself in the background, perhaps a little too much, but always facilitating NSG's flights of creativity. In his sAvEri ragam, the violinist used the phrase DPMPDP, DPMPDP, very well, and provided a very short but concise essay. His play during the entire kIravANi was very good, with an emphasis on plain notes in the alapanai, where he played a fast, lovely SRMPDNR,,,. He also played S-P less phrases in the alapanai, and followed up the plain notes with gamaka laden ascending patterns like S (,R,GR) R (,GMG,), covering the breadth of the raga admirably. The shruti shuddam with which he approached plain notes made it very pleasing. One of the highlights of the RTP was his swaras in kApi, where he played some beautiful LGJ type phrases. However, his almost total lack of usage of mandra sthayi complementation while accompanying for krithis left something to be desired. Nonetheless, his support was thoroughly capable and sensitive.

The percussion duo of Raghuraman and Selvapandian accompanied admirably, with the mrudangam vidwan playing with good anticipation during kalpana swaras, and he seemed to be up to the challenge in playing along to NSG's kaNakku patterns as well. The tIrmAnam to the sAvEri krithi was very well executed, and Raghuraman's accompaniment for krithis was quite good as well, though I felt he was playing for the rhythmn rather than the composition at times (I may well be mistaken, though). The khanjira was often lost in the mrudangam, but Selvapandian played with good azhuttham, especially during the thani, which was a short, decent affair.

NSG made it a point to announce most of the pieces, something I've never heard him do before, as well as invite questions about the music and concert at the end, and I'm unsure what exactly people think about the competence of kutcheri-going audience in Singapore! It was amusing to see NSG single out the Chinese man and Caucasian woman in the audience and enquire about their views on the concert and any queries they might have--they were certainly put on the spot. NSG then asked our own mridangam, Sri Mannarkoil Balaji, to speak, and he (perhaps keeping the thread about speeches in mind!) said a few words about the contrast between creating nuances on stage as a musician and appreciating these same nuances as a rasika in the audience. Perhaps he can add his views on the concert as well--it was truly a pleasure meeting him and NSG after the concert :)

Using Rajesh's scale, this would rate as a very good concert, though the kIravANi was really on a different plane.
Last edited by bilahari on 25 Aug 2009, 13:42, edited 1 time in total.

bilahari
Posts: 2631
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 09:02

Post by bilahari »

Forgot to mention--disappointing audience of about 20, though there was no thani exodus!

rshankar
Posts: 13754
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 22:26

Post by rshankar »

I think the pallavi must have been "gaNanAdanai manavEdanai tIravE nI ninai iha (in this world) para (and in the other) sukham tarum (gaNanAdanai...)"

rshankar
Posts: 13754
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 22:26

Post by rshankar »

bilahari - Awesome review - beautiful details...we need more of these from you!

bilahari
Posts: 2631
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 09:02

Post by bilahari »

Thanks, Ravi. Now that pallavi finally makes sense!

srikant1987
Posts: 2246
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 12:23

Post by srikant1987 »

bilahari wrote:The violinist, TR Vijaykumar, is a sishya of LGJ, though his technique with an even, strong bow (as opposed to the LGJ school which seems to emphasise modulation of bowing strength to closely mimic the vallinam and mellinam of vocal music), and his handling of brighas all seemed to suggest his style was an amalgam of several others, and most closely allied with that of Ganesh-Kumaresh.
Indeed, I recently listened to Ganesh-Kumaresh, and their style is indeed very LGJ-like, except the bowing, which is strong (and uniform).

By vallinam and mellinam of vocal music, do you mean the same as in Tamil phonetics? To phrase it more simply, is it something to indicate the sAhitya or the emotions?
Last edited by srikant1987 on 24 Aug 2009, 21:13, edited 1 time in total.

rajeshnat
Posts: 10121
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 08:04

Post by rajeshnat »

bilahari
You may be the only person in the world to hear three keeravAni mains of NSG in india(madras), US (sandiego) and Singapore. I can confidently say that it would have been very very interesting . Just one correction bilahari NSG is the prince of keerAvani, the king is KVN. A great and splendid review (I like you writing more on violin(you may be a backup violin artist ) , that will bring atleast few pointers for many like me who would always be lost in words in terms of communicating how the violin was played)l.

I am just curious on 2 things:
-----------------------------------
1. Looks like you did not go and introduce yourself as bilahari , he could have sung atleast ini namakOru - bilahari-KI composition
2. How about bala747 was he there,we need Boeing perspective after airbus ?
Last edited by rajeshnat on 24 Aug 2009, 21:48, edited 1 time in total.

s_hari
Posts: 872
Joined: 20 May 2007, 18:45

Post by s_hari »

bilahari - as usual nice writeup and review. I can hear NSG singing those sangathis, when i read the post. vAnanai must have been awsome, it is NSG specialty.

-hari

Sam Swaminathan
Posts: 846
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 08:45

Post by Sam Swaminathan »

"Boeing perspective after airbus"

:) :)

arasi
Posts: 16873
Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 09:30

Post by arasi »

Bilahari, our roving reviewer,
Awesome review (we don't expect anything less from you, I'm afraid!).
Every time vidyaarthi sings kIravAni, it is a new experience. As Hari says, you almost made us hear his singing!
I agree with you on the intimacy and warmth his music brings. It is the result of his becoming one with music, forgetting that he is performing. We get drawn into it because there is just him and his music, and we as the audience get to share the joy.
As the season nears, hope our other roving rasikA and super critic Vijay joins in.

PUNARVASU
Posts: 2498
Joined: 06 Feb 2010, 05:42

Post by PUNARVASU »

bilahari wrote:Forgot to mention--disappointing audience of about 20, though there was no thani exodus!
Obviously they were 'captive audinece' and not 'captured audience'; that is why there was not exodus during thani. :)
Bilahari, nice review of a soulful concert.

arasi
Posts: 16873
Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 09:30

Post by arasi »

Punarvasu,
Yes :)
The quality of a concert is not decided by the number of people who attend it. The word 'elite' has both positive and negative meanings and we know that well on the forum! An elite is the choicest part of a social group, the positive meaning being 'rasikAs'; negative (where CM is concerned) in that they come from a particular social class and nothing else. While some among that group enjoy music as much as you and I do, there are others who consider going to a concert as one of their social past times--particularly in December--to see and to be seen. No, this does not apply to the Singapore audience, I guess. Just to the Chennai elite!
Coming back to NSG, as a listener and observer at his concerts, while I do not see an immense crowd at many of them, it is interesting to watch the number of listeners who get absorbed in his music. The 'other kind' of elite may not be there, and just as well.
What surprises me though is that in spite of his many appearances on television, why don't those who know him from that medium do not come in droves to hear him, as they rush to hear other personalities. Am I missing something here?

bilahari
Posts: 2631
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 09:02

Post by bilahari »

Thanks all for your kind compliments.

Srikant, I meant vallinam and mellinam in a loose sense, as in conveying emotion, i.e. more forceful singing in expressing vIram, etc.

Rajesh, yes, KVN's puNNiam oru kODi, and especially his neravals are just magnificent. I am however partial to a single 50-odd minute recording of MDR-LGJ-VR where MDR sings the most brilliant kIravANi I've ever heard and will probably ever hear. But NSG's kIravANi is certainly up there with the best! I did not speak to NSG until after the concert, but I will surely get to listen to his ini namakkoru in the coming years, given how frequently our paths cross! I do not know what bala747 looks like, or even how old he is, so I have no idea if he attended the concert or not, although a younguish chap in front of me was taking notes, and he left right as the thani was starting. I'm not sure if it was Bala. But it will surely be very interesting to read his "Boeing" take on the proceedings!

Punarvasu, you are absolutely correct :)
Probably most of the real rasikas in Singapore were at the concert, and a lack of publicity cannot be blamed because there was a weekly advertisement in local papers.

Arasi,
Singapore has both types of elite, too, I assure you! I encountered one of the "other" kind last year after Sowmya's concert, who was busy turning up her nose at Sowmya's concert, complaining, "Why did she sing so much of all this raga alapanais and all that, you know, I mean it is SO unnecessary and it's not like we are all connoisseurs..." So basically she wanted to listen to a manOdharma sangItam concert minus the manOdharma. It was quite amusing.

I too wonder why more people don't attend NSG's concerts, especially as Jaya TV program seems so popular, such that a member of the audience in Singapore said she even used to watch it avidly when she was in Korea! But there is an uncompromising classicism in NSG's music that may not appeal to all. He's not one for an extended tukkada session, at least in my experience!
Last edited by bilahari on 25 Aug 2009, 10:07, edited 1 time in total.

bala747
Posts: 314
Joined: 20 Mar 2006, 12:56

Post by bala747 »

I wanted to make it for this concert but a last minute thing kept me away (prolonged discussion with the future father in law which turned a 10 minute issue into a 3 hour one). By the time I was done it was close to 8 and I rather not attend a concert than turn up late. Bilahari, I would never leave at the thani! I wasn't there, unfortunately.

The list looks nice, and for the first time in a long time, Saveri is sung here. Saveri happens to be one of my favourites (along with Purvikalyani, Yadukula Kambhoji, Panthuvarali, Mayamalavagoula, Varali, Surutti and Kedaragoula.. there is a trend here).

Kiravani is a raga that is hard to sing badly as the raga structure is such that even a simple rendition of the notes can produce a satisfactory alapana, but I am probably the worst critic of artistes who take up that raga (that and Sanmukhapriya), because it is hard to sing a great alapana in Kiravani. But NSG sings with a lot of bhavam in general, so this should have been good. How was his voice? Last I heard him his voice was in pretty bad shape. MDR's rendition was the immortal Kaligiyunte on two different occasions, one with an elaborate neraval in '(Iru) Padamula Bhakti jesina..' I have also heard KVN render a perfect Innamum Sandeha that I like above almost all other renditions in Keeravani. Amongst more recent renditions, OST sang a brilliant RTP in keeravani in Singapore once and it was also sung in numerous North/South Jugalbandhis (which I did not enjoy the slightest). Speaking of which...

I dislike the idea of a sketch RTP. Better no RTP than a hackneyed one, especially in a raga like Surutti, which can be elaborated in a leisurely manner. Has the RTP been reduced to tukkada status?! It's almost insulting both the raga and the idea of the RTP to do such a hatchet job of it. 17 minutes, of which I bet the ragamalikas themselves took close to 7 minutes. Shame.

Anyway who was the person who complained last year about alapanas? I wish I had heard that statement. She'll probably have never attended a concert ever again after I had delivered a few choice home truths at her.

bilahari
Posts: 2631
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 09:02

Post by bilahari »

Yes, bala, when this man left during the thani, I was almost sure it wasn't you! NSG's voice was in pretty good shape, but he didn't sing in tara sthayi that much, which was good because he tends to croak after the tara rishabam or so. His shruti shuddam was quite good overall, and was brilliant in the mandra sthayi as he was in San Diego. The kArvais were all executed flawlessly.

I agree that kIravANi's scale is attractive by itself, but that it's simultaneously difficult to really impress with kIravANi. But NSG really seems to have a grip over the raga such that his renditions are always interesting, imaginative, and bhava-laden. KVN's innamum sandEha paDalAmO is so beautiful!

Agree 100% about RTPs. It was about 2 min raga, 5 min thanam, 4 min neraval, 2 min swaras in suruTTi, 5 min ragamaliga.

I won't reveal the name of the person who complained about alapanais here -- but she's a regular "big" concertgoer.

arasi
Posts: 16873
Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 09:30

Post by arasi »

Being there or not, the Boeing can deliver the goods!
Thanks Bala for following 'the air bus on to the runway with your perspective'--as Sam put it.
I think it's touching when you let us get a glimpse into your life once in a while. Hope all is going well, and do keep us informed. Sorry you were held up :)
Last edited by arasi on 25 Aug 2009, 10:52, edited 1 time in total.

jananee
Posts: 272
Joined: 30 Jun 2007, 12:27

Post by jananee »

Missed the concert Bilahari..Had something else lined up. Wonderful review as always...catch you on Sunday!

vasanthakokilam
Posts: 10958
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 00:01

Post by vasanthakokilam »

>Being there or not, the Boeing can deliver the goods!

:)

bala747
Posts: 314
Joined: 20 Mar 2006, 12:56

Post by bala747 »

All these comments make me wish I was there at the concert! Any recordings of it? I think I know who the "Big" concertgoer is. The 'Sangeethathikku kilo enna velai' variety. It's people like her who give Singapore concert goers a bad name.

By the way the Mangalam's pallavi is actually "Ni naama roopa mulaku nittya jaya mangalam" and not "pavamaana" which is the first line of the anupallavi. Seen it appear this way in a few reviews so I just thought I'll point that out.

cienu
Posts: 2392
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 11:40

Post by cienu »

vasanthakokilam wrote:>Being there or not, the Boeing can deliver the goods!

:)
That was a good one Arasi :)
Last edited by cienu on 25 Aug 2009, 16:52, edited 1 time in total.

arasi
Posts: 16873
Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 09:30

Post by arasi »

Bilahari,
It strikes me that while NSG likes to connect with his audience and people in general, he may not be the kind of performer who goes after connections. While he is very much a people's person, he may not be that intent on public relations in the commercial sense. I may be wrong.
Yes, his singing is sedate. As laks says, it is bhAvam-oriented. It is not flashy. No fireworks, but his music can sparkle too, as we know.

Post Reply