Sandeep Narayan@Aasthika samAjam(Alwarpet) on Jan 20th,2014

Review the latest concerts you have listened to.
Post Reply
rajeshnat
Posts: 10123
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 08:04

Sandeep Narayan@Aasthika samAjam(Alwarpet) on Jan 20th,2014

Post by rajeshnat »

Sandeep Narayan@Aasthika samAjam(Alwarpet) on Jan 20th,2014
--------------------------------------
Violin : B.Ananthakrishnan
Mrudangam : SJ Arjun Ganesh
Kanjira : Anirudh Athreya

Concert Type : Nirvana - no concert to follow
Day/Duration : Monday / 2 hours and 5 mins
Concert Type/Crowd : Free concert - around 75
Occassion : Sadguru ThyagarAja music Festival

All excepting one number was by the bard of thiruvayaru

1.nAda thanum anisham (R) - cittaranjani
5 mins swaras
2. niravadi sukhadA(R) -ravichandrika
5 mins alapana and 3 mins violin return

3. nannu vidachi(R) - reetigowlai
6 mins alapana and 5 mins violin return
4. evvare rAmayyA(ragasketch, S) - gangeyabhooshani
Swaras for 8 mins

5. vinarAdhA nA manavi - devagAndhAri
6A. raghuvara nannu(R N S T) - pantuvarAli
14 mins alapana and 9 mins violin return
9 mins neraval in "manasuna nIki marulu konnAnu"
7 mins swaras
6B. tani

7. ninneyE rathi enru - bhAgEshri - BharathiyAr
8. shree rAma jaya ramA - yadhukulakAmbOdhi -T
9. nee nAma

rajeshnat
Posts: 10123
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 08:04

Re: Sandeep Narayan@Aasthika samAjam on Jan 20th,2014

Post by rajeshnat »

Sandeep always exudes an extremely high quotient of exuberance .His exuberance was matched with his general vocal throw and his voice indeed is consistent with no sagging moment . If there was a glitch, the glitch was quite prominent , it was not a glitch in the mic but in general for at least one number where his music just bordered on a very high decibel sound.

Sandeep started exceptionally well and the cittaranjani krithi had a really nice diction . tanum anisham was the phrase he sang instead of tanumanisham , his cittaranjani swaras were very apt and gave a flying start . The next alapana in ravichandrikaa is quite rare as many do not sing alapana.I enjoyed it and I guess certain overlap with nattaikurinji should be there is what I assume for a ravichandrika , any way he sang very well with its chittaswaras. niravadi sukhadA indeed came out well

The vilambit could have been a tad slower but still I enjoyed his reetigowlai krithi nannu vidachi. His voice gave a right emote to this lovely ragam reetigowlai, possibly a little more alankaram in a slower mode in lines like kodanda rama , pattabhi rama would have been more special.

The rare melakartha raga gangeyabhooshani was next and it was well presented , his voice power was indeed like his guru sanjay and with a general dose of higher creativity in swaras the ganeya bhooshani was really excellent. The first down hill bit started with a devagAndhari filler - out of all devagAndharis this vinaradha is quite fast, but i could not get a very arresting aural rendition of the krithi.

Atleast till this point sandeep's music though had a slightly high share of volume kind of not bothered me at all as his exuberance was so likable. When pantuvarAli came it gushed with such a force , the alapana was definitely enjoyable , really fast brighas and an orientation to packed sangathis is a music that i generall cherish vs a sowkhyam squat. Despite a personal tolerance of higher volume as the raga was pantuvarAli , i felt it was really too loud when krithi started. The heaviness in volume kind of banged my head . The neraval and swaras was louder almost a really high decibel tussle where his musical ideas never settled as it banged my ears. I could enjoy few creative sangathis in swaras for PV, but still overall felt the best when the krithi got over. I did not concentrate that much on tani .

The last two tukkadas came out very well - the bhAgeshri was the only number away from T .It gave a great contrast from telugu to thamizh and bharathiyar's lyrics always have highest emotive connection, the last utsava sampradaya krithi of T in yk kambOdhi could have been a bit more slower - but still enjoyed it . Sandeep indeed gave a great finish in tukkadas.

The violinist did match well ,IIRC for reetigowlai there was a shade of roughness. Overall BAK is a violinist to be watched out . Arjun Ganesh with his fast fingers could have purposely played with little more sparseness for atleast few songs . But Arjun was the youth who wanted to give the same punch as sandeep. Anirudh played with a nice kanjira azhuttam .

The overlap of sandeep and sanjay is almost there for each and every song , but personally i like it as i generally dont bother about overlap of guru and sishya as long as good things are there for sishya. One thing that is extremely prominent with Sandeep is his voice has a significantly better quality . The hall is not the best of halls in acoustic setup , possily if Sandeep and Arjun Ganesh had that in mind , the concert could have been a notch higher.


Overall a very good to excellent concert for 2 hours and 5 mins.

sridhar_ranga
Posts: 809
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 11:36

Re: Sandeep Narayan@Aasthika samAjam(Alwarpet) on Jan 20th,2

Post by sridhar_ranga »

Indeed a power packed and energetic concert from start to finish.

I felt the loudness could have been more due to the sound settings in the hall.

Yes, there were a couple of moments when Sandeep's anga-cheshTais too reminded me of his guru - especially the conclusive clap of the taaLam-putting-hands on the mridangist's face when he finished a song :)

Thoroughly enjoyed the concert.

Post Reply