--------------------------------------------------------------------
Few delayed concert reviews that just got slipped because of excess concerts
Accompanied by M.Chandrasekaran - violin , KV prasad - mridangam and ?? - ghatam
1. varnam in kAmbOdhi??
2. siddhi vinayakam (?,S)- shanmughapriyA - MD
3A. viruththam "pAdi kOduthAr pAmAlai" - Anandha bhairavi - ??
3B. ungaL puzhakkaDai - Ananda bhairavi - AndAL's TiruppAvai
4. vara nArada (R,S)- vijayashree - T
5A. cikkani pAlu

16 minutes of alApanai by TNS alone ,
neraval for 7 minutes in the usual "kantiki sundara" &
12 minutes of swaras
5B. tani
6. RTP - ranjani Ragam with pallavi rendition in ranjani + sumanEsa ranjani + shree - TNS??
7 minutes alApanai , 4 minutes violin return
tAnam for 7 minutes
pallavi line was "sumana rasikE sumanesa ranjani shree rAja mAthaNgi "
9 mins of swaras preceded by 6 minutes of pallavi
7. tu mAja shAmanu - hindustani Touch? - ?
8. perumAlE ??? - CM heavy rAGA? - ?
9. pavamAna
Usually I hear alteast 3 to 5 concerts of one my favourite vidwan TNS .This time I could only hear him just once , perhaps the sampling of TNS@ vani mahal was certainly not a good selection , despite the newly opened and lit vani mahal bridge

I was late by about 30 minutes , and I only heard the last few minutes of heavy voice depleted rendition of shanmughapriyA. The best no that was just very good was his Ananda bhairavi , shri TNS sang very well covering up very emotively with his right lyrical expression , certainly a right Ananda bhairavi tirrupAvai.The middle segment was a real let down. vijayashree (close cousin of varAli) was just average to good with Shri TNS voice problems partially covered with the not so voice mandated vijayashree. The 16 minutes of alApanai of shri TNS was just good for about 4 minutes ,
Shri TNS does have a tendency to go on and on in alApanai , perhaps he just wants to keep trying till his voice reaches a zone that suits his confidence .From 4th to 16th minute , he did that but certainly was below average rendition of kharakharapriyA, just too much of voice problem. I decided to taste gnambika , and joined back from cikkani pAlu, went just ok, Neraval had again too much of brigha laden voice problems. The swaras were not delivered sharp , despite his intention but definitely better than neraval. Overall a low key main rendition.Post tani that was just average to me(Shri KV prasad stopped too frequently and requested mike correction which made it a bit lowkey).
The RTP was a good finish. Certainly his alApanai in ranjani was good to very good ,tAnam was rendered in a very good fashion. Pallavi was just good , the swaras had a short shree rAgam, a longish sumanesa ranjani (can I say sumanesa ranjani has quite a resemblance to madhuvaNti) and a good ranjani finish.
The last tu mAja shAmanu was rendered excellently had a lot of hindustani touch, did not get the rAga there, the perumAlE was I think thirruppugazh was in a heavy carnatic rAga,only TNS and Lord perumAl must have got the lyrics , at times I dont know why thirruppugazh ?? is just rushed .
Overall this concert was my lowest concert of the season , the vidwat of sumanesa ranjani and rendition of Anandabhairavi was the take away here . A mediocre concert.Would be nice if Shri TNS finds a zone like Shri KVN /DKJ of 1990's where despite a little non cooperation of voice they still managed to give a good concert.