What's the right proportion of gamakam?
-
music_is_life
- Posts: 100
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 01:53
The other day I was listening to a vidwan speaking about how much gamakam to be used for any raga. He was mentioning that some of that gets evolved after several stage performances. What I might think as sounding very good may not be so on the stage and it takes a while to optimize the use of gamakam. He demonstrated this also beautifully. I have felt that Shri Sanjay Subramaniam amongst the current generation of artists who have mastered this art. Is there any structured way one can achieve this perfection?
Last edited by music_is_life on 16 May 2009, 01:22, edited 1 time in total.
-
S.NAGESWARAN
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: 11 Feb 2009, 08:54
-
mohan
- Posts: 2808
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 16:52
-
srikant1987
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 12:23
-
keerthi
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: 12 Oct 2008, 14:10
At the sampradAya festival in bangalore gayana samaja, on the 10th may, (see my post under kutchery reviews) I had occasion to talk to Vidushi shachi dEvi, who is a professor in the Dept. of Music..
She had this most interesting theory about the degree of oscillation in gamakas like the kampita and andOlita, and said that the degree must be the same in the VAdi and samVAdi notes.. this holds good for the M and N notes in KalyANi..
This had to do with the extent of andolana or kampana..
If one has to know about how frequently or where the gamaka-s, the krtis must be used as the guide.
She had this most interesting theory about the degree of oscillation in gamakas like the kampita and andOlita, and said that the degree must be the same in the VAdi and samVAdi notes.. this holds good for the M and N notes in KalyANi..
This had to do with the extent of andolana or kampana..
If one has to know about how frequently or where the gamaka-s, the krtis must be used as the guide.
-
S.NAGESWARAN
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: 11 Feb 2009, 08:54
-
S.NAGESWARAN
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: 11 Feb 2009, 08:54
ignoramus,
The download link for G.S.MANI'S speech about gamakams is given below [MEDIA FIRE].
http://www.mediafire.com/file/z1zmngxjgoy/08-Speech by SriG.S.MANI.mp3
S.NAGESWARAN.
The download link for G.S.MANI'S speech about gamakams is given below [MEDIA FIRE].
http://www.mediafire.com/file/z1zmngxjgoy/08-Speech by SriG.S.MANI.mp3
S.NAGESWARAN.
-
binmux
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 06 Apr 2009, 23:00
One of the most important charateristic of CM as I heard from my guru was that, when a gamakam is employed such that a a glide is done between one swara and another swara (eg between D and M), in such instances we should never find/perceive a trace of P which is in between these 2 swaras. It does not matter if the glide also between 2 much far apart swaras like N & M - the same principle should hold.
My perception of gamakam is also this - the swaras are the skeletal basis for the raga - you build the raga swaroopam by embellishing it with various kinds of gamakams. At one point in this evolution when this becomes seperately identifiable from other ragams then we can probably say the kind/amount of gamakams employed has gained some identity. Now how to maintain this depends on whether one still can recognize the feel for the ragam.
The very basic principle therefore is this - any gamakam that is employed so that it sounds good and also maintain the feel of the ragam is a good one. Now the paradox is ragam is also defined by the gamakams that are employed !!
Of course this becomes a very grey area where there is contention between innovation and sticking to tradition.
My perception of gamakam is also this - the swaras are the skeletal basis for the raga - you build the raga swaroopam by embellishing it with various kinds of gamakams. At one point in this evolution when this becomes seperately identifiable from other ragams then we can probably say the kind/amount of gamakams employed has gained some identity. Now how to maintain this depends on whether one still can recognize the feel for the ragam.
The very basic principle therefore is this - any gamakam that is employed so that it sounds good and also maintain the feel of the ragam is a good one. Now the paradox is ragam is also defined by the gamakams that are employed !!
Of course this becomes a very grey area where there is contention between innovation and sticking to tradition.
-
narayan
- Posts: 385
- Joined: 05 Oct 2008, 07:43
-
srikant1987
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 12:23
It's not so much about "strong" use as about peculiar gamakams. Many "new" ragas, such as obscure mELakartAs for example, have "standard" gamakams, like oscillating between rishabha and madhyama for a sadharna gandhara when the raga also has a shuddha gandhara.narayan wrote:A slightly related question. Is there any 'new' ragam (e.g. karnaranjani or such) where there is strong usage of gamakams?
-
music_is_life
- Posts: 100
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 01:53