Dr. M.Balamuralihrisha and Vikku at Kamaraj Hall
-
ssv
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 19 Aug 2009, 12:49
A program of two maestros that very few knew about. The hall was less than a quarter full.
Vikku started the rock concert with his extremely loud and jarring cacophony. His entourage forgot that there was a mike and that it was a closed auditorium. They sounded like a bunch of monkeys who were handed the percussion instruments.
Dr.Balamurali tried to add some decorum when he sang a new raga called Siddhi. His booming yet melodious voice filled the room with the raga Siddhi. With just four notes â€â€Â
Vikku started the rock concert with his extremely loud and jarring cacophony. His entourage forgot that there was a mike and that it was a closed auditorium. They sounded like a bunch of monkeys who were handed the percussion instruments.
Dr.Balamurali tried to add some decorum when he sang a new raga called Siddhi. His booming yet melodious voice filled the room with the raga Siddhi. With just four notes â€â€Â
-
coolkapali
- Posts: 179
- Joined: 03 May 2007, 14:32
-
vasanthakokilam
- Posts: 10958
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 00:01
-
rajesh_rs
- Posts: 184
- Joined: 01 Dec 2007, 11:18
When someone feels really bad about a concert and wants to express it, this is, in my humble opinion, not the sort of moderation or advice he should be getting. Reasoning it out with the person is a better method of maintaining decorum. Instead, if stifling and impractical rules without regard for one's opinion are posited, no one actually benefits and everyone will reduce participation.vasanthakokilam wrote:ssv: You have the choice to edit your post and possibly reword it, if you indeed feel that your words may offend Vikku fans.
-
Nick H
- Posts: 9473
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 02:03
Me too.
Age and seniority do not protect an artist in any way from the impressions of an audience. There are no rules. Rasikas should speak as they find.
However...
I was not there, but I wonder, none the less, whether the artists can really be blamed, or, if as is often the case, their performance was ruined by the sound engineers. It is really, really difficult, even for a grand master, to deafen anybody with a ghatam!
Age and seniority do not protect an artist in any way from the impressions of an audience. There are no rules. Rasikas should speak as they find.
However...
I was not there, but I wonder, none the less, whether the artists can really be blamed, or, if as is often the case, their performance was ruined by the sound engineers. It is really, really difficult, even for a grand master, to deafen anybody with a ghatam!
-
rajesh_rs
- Posts: 184
- Joined: 01 Dec 2007, 11:18
Good point. The sound engineering could be much of the problem in these sorts of situations. One little mistake there and the whole experience of a concert could be ruined. I sincerely believe that for the level of talent and virtuosity we have in music we have outdated methods of presenting it to an audience. In the realm of non-live concerts, I guess Margazhi ragam sets a standard.nick H wrote:Me too.
Age and seniority do not protect an artist in any way from the impressions of an audience. There are no rules. Rasikas should speak as they find.
However...
I was not there, but I wonder, none the less, whether the artists can really be blamed, or, if as is often the case, their performance was ruined by the sound engineers. It is really, really difficult, even for a grand master, to deafen anybody with a ghatam!
-
semmu86
- Posts: 960
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 09:39
It is quite possible nick.. In fact one very senior mrudangam artiste almost made me deaf in one concert last december to such an extent , that i heard almost the entire concert with cotton in my ears.. of course i was forced to stay because of the main artiste..nick H wrote:. It is really, really difficult, even for a grand master, to deafen anybody with a ghatam!
At most cases , the fault seems to be with the musicians who keep on demanding high volumes ( one of the reasons could be the lack of feedback given to the stage )...
But there is also the other side. Again , last year in one of the concerts of the same mrudanga vidwan , he refused any feedback to be given ( if there is no feedback given to the stage , how can he have a feel of the sound system ?? ) but kept on demanding increase in mike volume.. I just couldnt stop thinking how foolish that was...
In some cases , the culprits would be the army of disciples who accompany senior vidwans ( PS : am not targetting anyone here ) ..Many a time i have seen them going here and there and persuading the mike man to increase the volume for their guru alone..
Its only two things in my opinion.. The artistes should leave the sound arrangement entirely to the mike men.. Or if the volume level is imbalanced for vocalist/accompanyinng artistes , we rasikas should take the initiative in intimating them..or even better , the artistes themselves can ask for a feedback from the audience about the sound arrangement after the first piece or so like how ravikiran generally does in his concerts..
Arvind..
Last edited by semmu86 on 31 Aug 2009, 18:10, edited 1 time in total.
-
rajesh_rs
- Posts: 184
- Joined: 01 Dec 2007, 11:18
Could it be that the mrdangam being capable of generating more bass sounds than the ghatam is more adept at making one go deaf if amplified badly?semmu86 wrote:It is quite possible nick.. In fact one very senior mrudangam artiste almost made me deaf in one concert last december to such an extent , that i heard almost the entire concert with cotton in my ears.. of course i was forced to stay because of the main artiste..nick H wrote:. It is really, really difficult, even for a grand master, to deafen anybody with a ghatam!
-
Nick H
- Posts: 9473
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 02:03
I am reminded of an accident report on a motoring forum: one bike causes eight-car pile-up. No, it was not the fault of the bike that the other seven cars hit each other, it was the fault of their drivers for driving too close to the vehicle in front of them.
It is a case of responsibility. Whilst we can criticize artists for asking for more volume, they usually do so because they have no feedback and the stage is an acoustic void. Even though it may be make it hard for the the artists sometimes, the audience is the priority and the sound engineers, and the organisers, need to know, and use, the word no. Ultimately we have them to blame for bad sound, either being deafened, or not being able to hear a particular musician at all.
Unfortunately, part of the problem is that artists tend to be revered, and nobody wants to say no to them. I don't know how many artist actually want reverence; I'm sure there are more than a few that do. The others, I'm sure, would rather have their music appreciated than their feet touched!
Err... we've been here many times before...
(actually, an over-amplified concert is a bit like a multiple-car pile-up! Thank god, though, the audience usually survices!)
It is a case of responsibility. Whilst we can criticize artists for asking for more volume, they usually do so because they have no feedback and the stage is an acoustic void. Even though it may be make it hard for the the artists sometimes, the audience is the priority and the sound engineers, and the organisers, need to know, and use, the word no. Ultimately we have them to blame for bad sound, either being deafened, or not being able to hear a particular musician at all.
Unfortunately, part of the problem is that artists tend to be revered, and nobody wants to say no to them. I don't know how many artist actually want reverence; I'm sure there are more than a few that do. The others, I'm sure, would rather have their music appreciated than their feet touched!
Err... we've been here many times before...
(actually, an over-amplified concert is a bit like a multiple-car pile-up! Thank god, though, the audience usually survices!)
-
vasanthakokilam
- Posts: 10958
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 00:01
Rajesh, My post was more like an FYI. The OP felt sorry for wording it in such a way that may offend vikku fans while standing by the content of his post.rajesh_rs wrote:When someone feels really bad about a concert and wants to express it, this is, in my humble opinion, not the sort of moderation or advice he should be getting. Reasoning it out with the person is a better method of maintaining decorum. Instead, if stifling and impractical rules without regard for one's opinion are posited, no one actually benefits and everyone will reduce participation.vasanthakokilam wrote:ssv: You have the choice to edit your post and possibly reword it, if you indeed feel that your words may offend Vikku fans.
-
rajesh_rs
- Posts: 184
- Joined: 01 Dec 2007, 11:18
-
sureshvv
- Posts: 5542
- Joined: 05 Jul 2007, 18:17
I was at the concert and I felt severely let down even with MBKs singing. He just seemed bent on singing unlikely notes together in sequence and the whole alapana went that way. Varadarajan on the violin mimicked this with great aplomb when it was his turn. Thankfully the kritis retained their beauty and made the experience somewhat worthwhile. MBKs voice is still phenomenal and his ability shows no sign of aging. But it felt to me that MBK has stopped listening to good carnatic music and is more into Jimi Hendrix now 
Last edited by sureshvv on 01 Sep 2009, 11:55, edited 1 time in total.
-
coolkapali
- Posts: 179
- Joined: 03 May 2007, 14:32
-
saianamika
- Posts: 57
- Joined: 05 Feb 2010, 22:56
-
arasi
- Posts: 16877
- Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 09:30
Some experiments do not succeed. Perhaps this was one of those. In chemistry and in content--the sound system plotting against it too.
Nick,
Yes, we can speak our minds--but how we do it is another thing. You do it well, without being impulsive and insensitive in your utterings.
I am not thinking of being 'polite, polite', but about saying things about any artiste, big or small, with the thought in the back of our minds that we are supporters of the art (friends?) and not just idle nay sayers. Just as the musicians have the responsibility to deliver what is expected, we in turn are expected to respond responsibly. It is nice to keep in mind that we love our music while we express our opinions. Even with concerts which we pay for, we cannot act like irate customers who are dissatisfied with the goods.
Again, to speak your mind is fine. But how?
Nick,
Yes, we can speak our minds--but how we do it is another thing. You do it well, without being impulsive and insensitive in your utterings.
I am not thinking of being 'polite, polite', but about saying things about any artiste, big or small, with the thought in the back of our minds that we are supporters of the art (friends?) and not just idle nay sayers. Just as the musicians have the responsibility to deliver what is expected, we in turn are expected to respond responsibly. It is nice to keep in mind that we love our music while we express our opinions. Even with concerts which we pay for, we cannot act like irate customers who are dissatisfied with the goods.
Again, to speak your mind is fine. But how?
Last edited by arasi on 01 Sep 2009, 21:24, edited 1 time in total.