U Srinivas @ Fort High School

Review the latest concerts you have listened to.
Post Reply
badari
Posts: 507
Joined: 14 Feb 2009, 10:03

Post by badari »

01 Viriboni Bhairavi Ata Pachimiriyam Adiappayya
02 Mahaganapathim Nata Adi Muttuswami Dixitar
03 Nadopasana Begada Adi Tyagaraja
04 Shrirama Padama Saramati
05 Sogasuga Mrudanga Talamu Sri Ranjani Adi Tyagaraja
06 Nenedu Vedakudura Harikamboji Adi Tyagaraja
07 Raghuvamsha Sudha Navarasa Kanada Adi
08 Kaligiyunte Gada Keeravani Adi Tyagaraja
09 Enta Muddo Bindumalini Adi Tyagaraja
10 Honours
11 Jagadodharana Karnaaka Kapi Adi PurandaraDasa
12 Ragamalika
13 Sai Bhajan
14 SindhuBhairavi
15 Tillana
16 Pavamana Mangalam Saurastra Adi Tyagaraja

Volin accompaniment was below par...
keeravani was superb. Ella V Rao (Mridangam) was outstanding !!!

vasanthakokilam
Posts: 10958
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 00:01

Post by vasanthakokilam »

>07 Raghuvamsha Sudha Navarasa Kanada Adi

You meant to write 'kadanakudUkalam', I assume.

shishya
Posts: 262
Joined: 08 Jan 2007, 20:02

Post by shishya »

srIrAma pAdamA is in the rAga amruta vAhini

badari
Posts: 507
Joined: 14 Feb 2009, 10:03

Post by badari »

thanks for the corrections

badari
Posts: 507
Joined: 14 Feb 2009, 10:03

Post by badari »

Accompaniments:
Violin : H_K_Venkatram
Mridanga: Yella_Venkatershwara_Rao
Khanjira: Guru Prasanna

srikant1987
Posts: 2246
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 12:23

Post by srikant1987 »

I think #6 is actually karnATaka behAg.

rajaglan
Posts: 709
Joined: 29 Dec 2006, 21:34

Post by rajaglan »

badari,

I thought it was mandolin brothers, ie Rajes was also accompanying.

In some other thread (ganesh kumaresh violin) I heard Usrinivas played dharmavathi though
there was a doubt about it.

So is bindumalini the main.
No RTP, surprising in a instrumental concert.

badari
Posts: 507
Joined: 14 Feb 2009, 10:03

Post by badari »

Sorry i misseed out.... It was U Srinivas and U Rajesh

badari
Posts: 507
Joined: 14 Feb 2009, 10:03

Post by badari »

rajaglan wrote:badari,

I thought it was mandolin brothers, ie Rajes was also accompanying.

In some other thread (ganesh kumaresh violin) I heard Usrinivas played dharmavathi though
there was a doubt about it.

So is bindumalini the main.
No RTP, surprising in a instrumental concert.
Honours was done after Bindumalii.. Keeravani was the main piece

visaalam
Posts: 63
Joined: 15 Jan 2009, 10:17

Post by visaalam »


KarnatikLover
Posts: 113
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 02:30

Post by KarnatikLover »

I heard him live last in 2004. I guess nothing much has changed. Just a lot of noise...
I wish he'd listen to his own performances from the late 80's.

rajaglan
Posts: 709
Joined: 29 Dec 2006, 21:34

Post by rajaglan »

KarnatikLover wrote:I heard him live last in 2004. I guess nothing much has changed. Just a lot of noise...
I wish he'd listen to his own performances from the late 80's.

noise : Are you rerferring to the rhythm dept in his kutcheries?

dwade
Posts: 12
Joined: 18 Jul 2009, 20:16

Post by dwade »

KarnatikLover wrote:I heard him live last in 2004. I guess nothing much has changed. Just a lot of noise...
I wish he'd listen to his own performances from the late 80's.

How can u call yourself a karnatiklover if you cannot respect an artist of Shrinivas' caliber. If you do not like his music, dont listen to it rather than disrespecting him. What a bunch of haters!!

arasi
Posts: 16873
Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 09:30

Post by arasi »

Was it an off day for H.K. Venkatram? He plays very well as a rule.

dwade,
Those who have posted above don't question Srinivas's vidvat. His great ability in playing an instrument with limited scope is acknowledged by them. These are comments just on his recent performances. Of course, tastes differ too.

rshankar
Posts: 13754
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 22:26

Post by rshankar »

dwade wrote:How can u call yourself a karnatiklover if you cannot respect an artist of Shrinivas' caliber. If you do not like his music, dont listen to it rather than disrespecting him. What a bunch of haters!!
I would pay this a lot more attention if this was the poster's universal opinion about so many other posts that have found fault with other established, as well as up-and-coming artists. This poster only comes to the defense of Srinivas..:P

This is a forum where we are all carnatic lovers (whether or not we like the current playing styles of Sri Srinivas, Sri Kadri, Vid Kanyakumari etc) - all that is asked of us is to be polite and objective in our criticisms (even if we question someone's vidvat). I think KarnatikLover was well within his rights to say what he said, because of the tone in which he said it.

dwade
Posts: 12
Joined: 18 Jul 2009, 20:16

Post by dwade »

arasi wrote:Was it an off day for H.K. Venkatram? He plays very well as a rule.

dwade,
Those who have posted above don't question Srinivas's vidvat. His great ability in playing an instrument with limited scope is acknowledged by them. These are comments just on his recent performances. Of course, tastes differ too.
Of course tastes differ..thats the whole point. If you dont like someone's music, well, good for you. You don't have to disrespect the artist or the playing style. There are lot of people who love and listen to his music to this day and he still plays for packed houses!!

dwade
Posts: 12
Joined: 18 Jul 2009, 20:16

Post by dwade »

rshankar wrote:
dwade wrote:How can u call yourself a karnatiklover if you cannot respect an artist of Shrinivas' caliber. If you do not like his music, dont listen to it rather than disrespecting him. What a bunch of haters!!
I would pay this a lot more attention if this was the poster's universal opinion about so many other posts that have found fault with other established, as well as up-and-coming artists. This poster only comes to the defense of Srinivas..:P

This is a forum where we are all carnatic lovers (whether or not we like the current playing styles of Sri Srinivas, Sri Kadri, Vid Kanyakumari etc) - all that is asked of us is to be polite and objective in our criticisms (even if we question someone's vidvat). I think KarnatikLover was well within his rights to say what he said, because of the tone in which he said it.
I couldn't care less if you do not pay any attention to my posts. Yes, as a matter of fact U.Shrinivas is my guru and I take strong objection if someone maligns his playing style. What is your qualification to "criticize" and question his "vidvat"? As mentioned in my post above, there are a lots of people who care for his music today and that doesn't mean their taste is inferior. Can you tell me what is objective about terming Shrinivas' style of music as noise?? Of course people have different opinions, but, in a public forum people should also be sensitive to others tastes and interests. Try to think from the other person's point of view before playing devil's advocate.

srutishree
Posts: 26
Joined: 16 Jan 2008, 04:56

Post by srutishree »

There's no accounting for taste, so U Srinivas's "playing to packed houses" doesn't mean anything -- popularity doesn't equal vidwath, and I'm sure all rasikas are aware of the difference.

Dwade is fully entitled to come to his guru's defence, so long as we don't have comments like "what is your qualification to criticise.....etc". Intemperate remarks such as these do nothing to further one's argument.

As for the term "noise", it is unfortunate, but US's recent concerts do seem to have a surfeit of percussion at the cost of melody.

dwade
Posts: 12
Joined: 18 Jul 2009, 20:16

Post by dwade »

srutishree wrote:There's no accounting for taste, so U Srinivas's "playing to packed houses" doesn't mean anything -- popularity doesn't equal vidwath, and I'm sure all rasikas are aware of the difference.

Dwade is fully entitled to come to his guru's defence, so long as we don't have comments like "what is your qualification to criticise.....etc". Intemperate remarks such as these do nothing to further one's argument.

As for the term "noise", it is unfortunate, but US's recent concerts do seem to have a surfeit of percussion at the cost of melody.
What is unfortunate is people like "you" questioning Shrinivas' vidwath. Of course he doesn't have to prove anything to anyone. There are always a small set of people who are unhappy about everything and everyone else in life. Who are you to judge a rasika? Just because you like/dislike something doesn't entitle you to judge another rasika..You have not proved anything in your argument. Finally, if you think his concerts produce noise, why even bother?

rshankar
Posts: 13754
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 22:26

Post by rshankar »

dwade wrote: Who are you to judge a rasika? Just because you like/dislike something doesn't entitle you to judge another rasika..You have not proved anything in your argument. Finally, if you think his concerts produce noise, why even bother?
I must have problems understanding - weren't you the one who started to judge another rasika? Or, do you have special qualifications to do so?

bilahari
Posts: 2631
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 09:02

Post by bilahari »

This is a borderline case, but I think DNFTT applies.

dwade
Posts: 12
Joined: 18 Jul 2009, 20:16

Post by dwade »

rshankar wrote:
dwade wrote: Who are you to judge a rasika? Just because you like/dislike something doesn't entitle you to judge another rasika..You have not proved anything in your argument. Finally, if you think his concerts produce noise, why even bother?
I must have problems understanding - weren't you the one who started to judge another rasika? Or, do you have special qualifications to do so?
Looks like u do have problems understanding.

dwade
Posts: 12
Joined: 18 Jul 2009, 20:16

Post by dwade »

bilahari wrote:This is a borderline case, but I think DNFTT applies.
I dont know who you are referring to,but, I am not the one who instigated this argument!

kbryant
Posts: 4
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 08:11

Post by kbryant »

--
Last edited by kbryant on 14 Oct 2009, 08:31, edited 1 time in total.

srutishree
Posts: 26
Joined: 16 Jan 2008, 04:56

Post by srutishree »

It is sad, but Dwade's responses are becoming noisier than the concerts he is defending. No point in continuing this discussion.

dwade
Posts: 12
Joined: 18 Jul 2009, 20:16

Post by dwade »

kbryant wrote:hey dwade,

big fan of mandolin srinivas....

but you are a totally overrated player...u survive on the referee's whistle and the foul line

and i am the greatest player :)
You leave that to MJ...You are nothing without Shaq/Pau..Remember the lottery???
Last edited by dwade on 14 Oct 2009, 08:18, edited 1 time in total.

kbryant
Posts: 4
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 08:11

Post by kbryant »

-
Last edited by kbryant on 14 Oct 2009, 08:32, edited 1 time in total.

dwade
Posts: 12
Joined: 18 Jul 2009, 20:16

Post by dwade »

kbryant wrote:hey dwade,

big fan of mandolin srinivas....

but you are a totally overrated player...u survive on the referee's whistle and the foul line

and i am the greatest player :)
Cannot believe u created a profile for this..anyway u r the one who started..basketball in a music forum, u stick to it!
Last edited by dwade on 14 Oct 2009, 08:23, edited 1 time in total.

kbryant
Posts: 4
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 08:11

Post by kbryant »

--
Last edited by kbryant on 14 Oct 2009, 08:41, edited 1 time in total.

dwade
Posts: 12
Joined: 18 Jul 2009, 20:16

Post by dwade »

kbryant wrote:mandolin srinivas with palghat raghu is a super combination...i hope we can agree on that dwhistle
I agree ball hog

rajaglan
Posts: 709
Joined: 29 Dec 2006, 21:34

Post by rajaglan »

Concert songs : main and submain are already avilable as albums.
Noise : I agree in some of his concerts due to rhythm guys.
And he plays to gallery nowadays (excluding his favorites like raghuvamsa..)

Nowadays I donot go to his concerts with lots of interest for the fear of repetition and the noise. I guess noise is not something found in every concert.
He is such a great vidwan and senior to even Sanjay & Vijay Siva and even in wisdom dept, with so many albums ...But still something missing
in his concerts. A 1 hour each , Main and RTP with only mridangam with one mike just before him - will be great

Post Reply