R.K.Shriramkumar (Vocal) @ NSTSS, Chennai (19 Apr 2007)
-
- Posts: 705
- Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 22:48
Venue: Ranjani Kalaikkoodam, NSTSS, Nanganallur, Chennai
Date: 19 Apr 2007
Organizer: Nanganallur Sri Thyagaraja Sangeetha Samajam (NSTSS)
Occasion: Sri Syama Sastri Jayanthi
Vocal: Sri R.K. Shriramkumar
Violin: Sri Mullaivasal G. Chandramouli
Mrudangam: Sri J. Vaidyanathan
Tambura: Sri Balaji
List of songs:
1) dayAnidhE mAmava (varnam) - bEgada - Adi - syAma sAstri (S)
2) pAhi shrI girirAjasutE - Anandabhairavi - rUpakam - syAma sAstri
3) ninnuvinaga mari - pUrvikalyANi - misra cApu - syAma sAstri (ANS)
4) dEvi brOva - cintAmaNi - Adi - syAma sAstri
5) janani natajanaparipAlini - sAvEri - Adi - syAma sAstri (A)
6) kAmAkshI (svarajati) - yadukulakAmbOji - misra cApu - syAma sAstri
7) nannu brOvarAdA - gauLipantu - misra cApu - syAma sAstri
8 ) sari yevarammA - bhairavi - kanDa jampai - syAma sAstri (ANST)
9) mAyammA yani nE - Ahiri - Adi - syAma sAstri
10) karuNajUDa ninnunammina - srI - Adi - syAma sAstri
11) kAmAkshI lOkasAkshiNI (gItam) - madyamAvati - misra cApu - syAma sAstri
(Key: O=raga outline, A=raga alapana, N=neraval, S=kalpana swaram, T=taniavartanam)
Popular violin artist Sri R.K. Shriramkumar presented a nice 2.5 hr vocal concert on Sri Syama Sastri kritis. Special mention must be made of Sri J. Vaidyanathan who played well for all the songs.
Source: http://ramsabode.wordpress.com/2007/04/ ... i19042007/
Date: 19 Apr 2007
Organizer: Nanganallur Sri Thyagaraja Sangeetha Samajam (NSTSS)
Occasion: Sri Syama Sastri Jayanthi
Vocal: Sri R.K. Shriramkumar
Violin: Sri Mullaivasal G. Chandramouli
Mrudangam: Sri J. Vaidyanathan
Tambura: Sri Balaji
List of songs:
1) dayAnidhE mAmava (varnam) - bEgada - Adi - syAma sAstri (S)
2) pAhi shrI girirAjasutE - Anandabhairavi - rUpakam - syAma sAstri
3) ninnuvinaga mari - pUrvikalyANi - misra cApu - syAma sAstri (ANS)
4) dEvi brOva - cintAmaNi - Adi - syAma sAstri
5) janani natajanaparipAlini - sAvEri - Adi - syAma sAstri (A)
6) kAmAkshI (svarajati) - yadukulakAmbOji - misra cApu - syAma sAstri
7) nannu brOvarAdA - gauLipantu - misra cApu - syAma sAstri
8 ) sari yevarammA - bhairavi - kanDa jampai - syAma sAstri (ANST)
9) mAyammA yani nE - Ahiri - Adi - syAma sAstri
10) karuNajUDa ninnunammina - srI - Adi - syAma sAstri
11) kAmAkshI lOkasAkshiNI (gItam) - madyamAvati - misra cApu - syAma sAstri
(Key: O=raga outline, A=raga alapana, N=neraval, S=kalpana swaram, T=taniavartanam)
Popular violin artist Sri R.K. Shriramkumar presented a nice 2.5 hr vocal concert on Sri Syama Sastri kritis. Special mention must be made of Sri J. Vaidyanathan who played well for all the songs.
Source: http://ramsabode.wordpress.com/2007/04/ ... i19042007/
-
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 04:25
-
- Posts: 1658
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 09:01
I once visited Sri RKSK's house and heard his render two beautiful Dikshitar krithis - mAmava raghuvIra [mAhuri] and tyAgarAja mahadhvajArOha [shri]. His singing was nothing short of excellent.
Last edited by prashant on 20 Apr 2007, 15:08, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 22:32
ksrimech:
I couldnt find natajanaparipalini in saveri.
But i have Smt DKP's sarievaramma (20 mts)
http://www.badongo.com/file/2811241
I remember listening to Sri GS Mani's elaborate bhairavi, let me double check on that.
I couldnt find natajanaparipalini in saveri.
But i have Smt DKP's sarievaramma (20 mts)
http://www.badongo.com/file/2811241
I remember listening to Sri GS Mani's elaborate bhairavi, let me double check on that.
Last edited by vasya10 on 20 Apr 2007, 21:06, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 981
- Joined: 04 Dec 2006, 13:56
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 17:01
G.S.Mani's sari evaramma (> 27mins)vasya10 wrote:I remember listening to Sri GS Mani's elaborate bhairavi, let me double check on that.
http://www.rogepost.com/n/2425702809
-
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: 05 Feb 2010, 10:50
i was also present in the almost full Ranjani Hall for this concert. To be truthful, i consider myself fortunate to have attended the concert.
The concert began with a nice rendition of the bEgaDa varNam and the anandabhairavi kriti, which followed was rendered with a lot of bhavam and the inspiring cittai svaram. Multiple charaNams were presented.
The pUrvikalyANi AlApanai was nice. The kriti was rendered with multiple caraNams and neraval and svarams at 'kAmitArtapala prdAyaki lalitE'. The cintAmaNi kriti was rendered soulfully. The sAvEri AlApanai was good, the kriti, which is said to be the first composition of Shyama Sastri, was rendered beautifully and was followed by a weighty rendition of the svarajati. The gauLipantu kriti was good.
The main bhairavi AlApanai was short and good. The kriti was rendered with all its grandeur with neraval and svarams at 'mAdhava sOdhari gaurI amba'. The Ahiri piece was nicely rendered. The srI rAgam and madhyamAvati pieces were both good as well.
Sri Shriram Kumar gave a nice concert with quite a few rare pieces and personal favourites. However, at places, his voice seemed to show strain, especially in the higher octave. It must have been a tight rope walk to sing Anandha bhairavi and bhairavi, sAvEri and gauLiapantu, srI rAgam and madhyamAvati in the same concert and get them all right.
Sri Chandramouli on the fiddle, was good in parts. Sri Vaidhyanathan was good in accompanying and his tani.
The concert began with a nice rendition of the bEgaDa varNam and the anandabhairavi kriti, which followed was rendered with a lot of bhavam and the inspiring cittai svaram. Multiple charaNams were presented.
The pUrvikalyANi AlApanai was nice. The kriti was rendered with multiple caraNams and neraval and svarams at 'kAmitArtapala prdAyaki lalitE'. The cintAmaNi kriti was rendered soulfully. The sAvEri AlApanai was good, the kriti, which is said to be the first composition of Shyama Sastri, was rendered beautifully and was followed by a weighty rendition of the svarajati. The gauLipantu kriti was good.
The main bhairavi AlApanai was short and good. The kriti was rendered with all its grandeur with neraval and svarams at 'mAdhava sOdhari gaurI amba'. The Ahiri piece was nicely rendered. The srI rAgam and madhyamAvati pieces were both good as well.
Sri Shriram Kumar gave a nice concert with quite a few rare pieces and personal favourites. However, at places, his voice seemed to show strain, especially in the higher octave. It must have been a tight rope walk to sing Anandha bhairavi and bhairavi, sAvEri and gauLiapantu, srI rAgam and madhyamAvati in the same concert and get them all right.
Sri Chandramouli on the fiddle, was good in parts. Sri Vaidhyanathan was good in accompanying and his tani.
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: 05 Feb 2007, 10:08
Dear Ram, Rbharath,
Was Gaulipantu rendered with a suddha madhyama or prati madhyama? I have heard artistes rendering this raga with either of these. Example: DKJ himself rendered SS's Tarunam Idamma with the prati madhyamam while MSG renders the raga with a suddha madhayama.
Curious what Sri RKS's version was.
R
Was Gaulipantu rendered with a suddha madhyama or prati madhyama? I have heard artistes rendering this raga with either of these. Example: DKJ himself rendered SS's Tarunam Idamma with the prati madhyamam while MSG renders the raga with a suddha madhayama.
Curious what Sri RKS's version was.
R
-
- Posts: 705
- Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 22:48
To me, it seemed neither. It was somewhere between the two madhyamams and seemed more closer to prati madhyamam. If I were asked to strictly choose one note, I would probably choose the pratimadhyamam.
However since I am still in the evolutionary (self-learning) process and have not satisfactorily graduated the stage of swarasthanam identification (though graduated from swara identification long back), I would prefer if someone else who attended the concert gave his/her opinion.
However since I am still in the evolutionary (self-learning) process and have not satisfactorily graduated the stage of swarasthanam identification (though graduated from swara identification long back), I would prefer if someone else who attended the concert gave his/her opinion.
-
- Posts: 629
- Joined: 30 Jul 2006, 08:56
Ram,ram wrote:However since I am still in the evolutionary (self-learning) process and have not satisfactorily graduated the stage of swarasthanam identification (though graduated from swara identification long back), I would prefer if someone else who attended the concert gave his/her opinion.
I don't get you. What do you mean by swara identification?
-
- Posts: 705
- Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 22:48
What I would consider as three major stages in the evolution I mentioned (self-made just for the purpose of appraising what stage of the learning process I am in at different points in time) are the following:
1) Swara identification: Someone sings a sahitya or sounds a series of notes on an instrument and one is able to say what those notes are in terms of sa, ri, ga, ma, pa, dha, ni. One may not yet be able to say, for instance, whether the ri is a small ri or a big ri but one is at least able to at least identify that it is a ri (rishabam)
2) Swarasthana identification - 1: This is where one is able to identify which of the 12 frequencies the note being sounded falls on (shadjam, shudha rishabam, chatushruti rishabam, sadharana gandharam, antara gandharam, shudha madhyamam, prati madhyamam, panchamam .... etc). One should also be able to clearly say if a note is being held just below or just above one of the 12 frequencies (as is done in some ragas).
3) Swarasthana identification -2: This is where one's microscope (ear+brain combination) gets even sharper and one is able to identify the 22 frequencies (shadjam, ekasruti rishabam, dvisruti rishabam .... etc ).
There could be more evolved levels but I would be satisfied to some extent if I were to cross stage 2). If you ask me, I haven't still crossed 2) to my satisfaction.
1) Swara identification: Someone sings a sahitya or sounds a series of notes on an instrument and one is able to say what those notes are in terms of sa, ri, ga, ma, pa, dha, ni. One may not yet be able to say, for instance, whether the ri is a small ri or a big ri but one is at least able to at least identify that it is a ri (rishabam)
2) Swarasthana identification - 1: This is where one is able to identify which of the 12 frequencies the note being sounded falls on (shadjam, shudha rishabam, chatushruti rishabam, sadharana gandharam, antara gandharam, shudha madhyamam, prati madhyamam, panchamam .... etc). One should also be able to clearly say if a note is being held just below or just above one of the 12 frequencies (as is done in some ragas).
3) Swarasthana identification -2: This is where one's microscope (ear+brain combination) gets even sharper and one is able to identify the 22 frequencies (shadjam, ekasruti rishabam, dvisruti rishabam .... etc ).
There could be more evolved levels but I would be satisfied to some extent if I were to cross stage 2). If you ask me, I haven't still crossed 2) to my satisfaction.
-
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: 05 Feb 2010, 10:50
as ram said, it was somewhere inbetween.
Some Vidwans like Smt Vedavalli and Smt Kalpakam Swaminathan dont accept the prati madhyama version of gauLipantu. They render all the gauLipantu pieces with suddha madhyamam. However, Smt Swaminathan plays the madhyamam a bit above the suddha madhyamam, somewhere in between the svarasthanams of suddha and prati madhyamams and calls it the reNDumkeTTAn or gauLipantu madhyamam.
Some Vidwans like Smt Vedavalli and Smt Kalpakam Swaminathan dont accept the prati madhyama version of gauLipantu. They render all the gauLipantu pieces with suddha madhyamam. However, Smt Swaminathan plays the madhyamam a bit above the suddha madhyamam, somewhere in between the svarasthanams of suddha and prati madhyamams and calls it the reNDumkeTTAn or gauLipantu madhyamam.
-
- Posts: 10958
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 00:01
-
- Posts: 629
- Joined: 30 Jul 2006, 08:56
Ram,
Not at all. Modesty has never been my strong suit. I look at CM concerts as 3 hours of rest to slow down my life and an opportunity to be away from fellow programmers. I don't indulge in fancy computations during that time. Now that you have laid out the path, I'm tempted to make a few attempts along those lines..
Not at all. Modesty has never been my strong suit. I look at CM concerts as 3 hours of rest to slow down my life and an opportunity to be away from fellow programmers. I don't indulge in fancy computations during that time. Now that you have laid out the path, I'm tempted to make a few attempts along those lines..