Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
-
thanjavooran
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 04:44
-
music_is_life
- Posts: 100
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 01:53
-
naaree
- Posts: 95
- Joined: 03 Feb 2006, 08:15
I thought that was a tongue in cheek comment about the brevity of his alapana.music_is_life wrote:From whatever little they showed today, I was more impressed with Abhilash's performance than Bharat Sundar's. Rightly, one of the judges mentioned that we felt like hearing more of his hamsanandi virutham when Abhilash stopped.
-
PUNARVASU
- Posts: 2498
- Joined: 06 Feb 2010, 05:42
while there were comments on the clarity of words in 'viruththam singing' (tamizh) there were a couple of mistakes in the slOkam 'vandEdevam umApatim' which was sung as viruththam; one of the participants went on singing 'vandEdEva umApatim' instead of 'vandEdEvam';another sang as 'bhaktajanAshrayAm, cha varadAm' (feminine gender)instead of 'bhaktajanAshrayam cha varadam' (masculine gender, as the slOkam is on Lord ShivA).
-
kharaharapriyajanyam
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 22:44
Yes, I agree with you all. Every participant paid attention only to the raga and not the sahitya. Not even one of the viruttams had the emotive impact that is absolutely necessary in viruttam singing. It was like hearing an alapana with sahitya. That's all!
Last edited by kharaharapriyajanyam on 10 Feb 2010, 09:20, edited 1 time in total.
-
venravi
- Posts: 58
- Joined: 26 Oct 2005, 18:12
Now available in youtube.
http://www.youtube.com/adomac#p/a/u/0/xLnWRfi-Xlc
http://www.youtube.com/adomac#p/a/u/0/xLnWRfi-Xlc
-
Ponbhairavi
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: 13 Feb 2007, 08:05
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
2/14/2010 Jaya T.V. carnatic music idol.
Congratulations to Jaya T.V. It is a very great service to the cause of carnatic music. Now that the event is over, a few comments by way of recapitulation and future guidance(??).
1- The event attracted world wide attention and great public exposure to lime light .So its impact is unimaginably tremendous. But this world- wide reach is a double edged weapon.. Greater the boost for the winners greater the frustration and depression for the non winners when they meet their guru, their parents, friends, well wishers and jealous rivals. I personally request the non winners to laugh it out(as Thiruvalluvar put it).
2- So there is a great responsibility for the Jaya T.V. For one or two winners who are encouraged there are eight or ten non winners.It is most important that they should not get frustrated and develop an aversion and hatred to music particularly because they are young and in an emotionally fragile age group this would be counterproductive to the avowed objective of the program.
3- Call anybody winner but give prizes awards concert opportunities company recordings etc to every non- winner. The difference of perks between the winners and the non winners should be reduced to the minimum as after all the performance- wise difference is microscopic only.
4- Having labeled the event as a contest and conducted it as such throughout, changing the nomenclature at the last minute does not fool anybody. To say that it is not a competition but it is a career is an empty advertisement slogan. It does not justify or placate anything. It is indeed a (ruthless cut-throat) competition (with a golden bistouri) for a career. Let us call a spade a spade. The best way to placate is by adopting the suggestion at 3 above.
5- It is a good thing that there were ten or twelve judges. But it is better if they are told to give marks out of ten or twenty and not hundred or two hundred This will give weight and importance to ½ and ¼ . Otherwise what parameter could justify and differentiate 172 and 165 for example. At the end the marks sheets should be collected from the judges and the totaling should be done by the comperer so that the result remains a suspense to the judges also till the last minute.
6- The judges should be selected in such a way that their relatives or disciples are not participants .It is meaningless to say that they will simply watch and not judge their wards. Their mere presence would influence the other judges. a more important thing: they might be subconsciously prompted to PULL DOWN other candidates by nitpicking on erroneous pronunciation which tantamounts to PULLING UP their own candidate indirectly.
7- The judges should desist from betraying themselves by subjective utterances likes “sabhash” “ good” “give him a very big hand “ etc. They should remain impassive like Dr Balamuralikrishna Dr Vedavalli Madurai G.S Mani Maharajapuram.
8- As Dr Balamuralikrishna indirectly put it, it is inevitable that the judges might be tempted to show off (in the eyes of their colleagues, chief guest or Jaya T.V large T.V. audience and world spectators ) and betray their own abhaswaram wrong eduppu - after all every one is human-. This can be avoided by adopting the following procedure: The judges should NOT ask the questions themselves. They should write down the questions and hand them over to a neutral musician who will collect all the questions and then pose them to the candidates throughout the program let us say a technical comperer- No one –essentially the candidates- will know which judge asked what question. In fact it is a nice shield for the judges also.
9- Why not a single word of appreciation or thanks or memento to the violinist and mridangist ?
10- A small brochure should be made giving the biodata of the participants and their email address so that the sabhas and private individuals can, if they feel like , encourage the non winners by giving them talent promotion concert opportunities or concerts on occasions like wedding receptions ,particularly in the context that the established musicians ask for astronomic honorarium to deliver indifferent and rehearsal music much below the standard of performance of the last competitor in this programme.
11- I am not connected or related to any of the participant. I have not seen or heard them before. But I am connected with a music sabha and competitions for the last couple of decades.
12- One heartening revelation: The future of our shastriya sangeetham is very bright and very safe in the hands of the younger generation despite the deleterious onslaught of cine and pervert music. Let us be very careful not to do anything directly or indirectly which will frustrate the youngsters.The principle of judiciary proclaims that it does not matter if the guilty escapes punishment but it is essential that the innocent is not punished. Similarly in any contest we should ensure that we do not create aversion or depression likely to dampen the enthusiasm of the youth and turn them away.We all emotionally witnessed how much of compassion , love and understanding the programme rightly and commendably showered in the first day towards one of the participants. [email protected]
-------
\
Congratulations to Jaya T.V. It is a very great service to the cause of carnatic music. Now that the event is over, a few comments by way of recapitulation and future guidance(??).
1- The event attracted world wide attention and great public exposure to lime light .So its impact is unimaginably tremendous. But this world- wide reach is a double edged weapon.. Greater the boost for the winners greater the frustration and depression for the non winners when they meet their guru, their parents, friends, well wishers and jealous rivals. I personally request the non winners to laugh it out(as Thiruvalluvar put it).
2- So there is a great responsibility for the Jaya T.V. For one or two winners who are encouraged there are eight or ten non winners.It is most important that they should not get frustrated and develop an aversion and hatred to music particularly because they are young and in an emotionally fragile age group this would be counterproductive to the avowed objective of the program.
3- Call anybody winner but give prizes awards concert opportunities company recordings etc to every non- winner. The difference of perks between the winners and the non winners should be reduced to the minimum as after all the performance- wise difference is microscopic only.
4- Having labeled the event as a contest and conducted it as such throughout, changing the nomenclature at the last minute does not fool anybody. To say that it is not a competition but it is a career is an empty advertisement slogan. It does not justify or placate anything. It is indeed a (ruthless cut-throat) competition (with a golden bistouri) for a career. Let us call a spade a spade. The best way to placate is by adopting the suggestion at 3 above.
5- It is a good thing that there were ten or twelve judges. But it is better if they are told to give marks out of ten or twenty and not hundred or two hundred This will give weight and importance to ½ and ¼ . Otherwise what parameter could justify and differentiate 172 and 165 for example. At the end the marks sheets should be collected from the judges and the totaling should be done by the comperer so that the result remains a suspense to the judges also till the last minute.
6- The judges should be selected in such a way that their relatives or disciples are not participants .It is meaningless to say that they will simply watch and not judge their wards. Their mere presence would influence the other judges. a more important thing: they might be subconsciously prompted to PULL DOWN other candidates by nitpicking on erroneous pronunciation which tantamounts to PULLING UP their own candidate indirectly.
7- The judges should desist from betraying themselves by subjective utterances likes “sabhash” “ good” “give him a very big hand “ etc. They should remain impassive like Dr Balamuralikrishna Dr Vedavalli Madurai G.S Mani Maharajapuram.
8- As Dr Balamuralikrishna indirectly put it, it is inevitable that the judges might be tempted to show off (in the eyes of their colleagues, chief guest or Jaya T.V large T.V. audience and world spectators ) and betray their own abhaswaram wrong eduppu - after all every one is human-. This can be avoided by adopting the following procedure: The judges should NOT ask the questions themselves. They should write down the questions and hand them over to a neutral musician who will collect all the questions and then pose them to the candidates throughout the program let us say a technical comperer- No one –essentially the candidates- will know which judge asked what question. In fact it is a nice shield for the judges also.
9- Why not a single word of appreciation or thanks or memento to the violinist and mridangist ?
10- A small brochure should be made giving the biodata of the participants and their email address so that the sabhas and private individuals can, if they feel like , encourage the non winners by giving them talent promotion concert opportunities or concerts on occasions like wedding receptions ,particularly in the context that the established musicians ask for astronomic honorarium to deliver indifferent and rehearsal music much below the standard of performance of the last competitor in this programme.
11- I am not connected or related to any of the participant. I have not seen or heard them before. But I am connected with a music sabha and competitions for the last couple of decades.
12- One heartening revelation: The future of our shastriya sangeetham is very bright and very safe in the hands of the younger generation despite the deleterious onslaught of cine and pervert music. Let us be very careful not to do anything directly or indirectly which will frustrate the youngsters.The principle of judiciary proclaims that it does not matter if the guilty escapes punishment but it is essential that the innocent is not punished. Similarly in any contest we should ensure that we do not create aversion or depression likely to dampen the enthusiasm of the youth and turn them away.We all emotionally witnessed how much of compassion , love and understanding the programme rightly and commendably showered in the first day towards one of the participants. [email protected]
-------
\
-
naaree
- Posts: 95
- Joined: 03 Feb 2006, 08:15
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
I felt the same. But though I agree with that in principle, the practicality of this is a little bit difficult. I think the candidate still deserves a chance. The CM community is such a small fraternity always trying to make it mainstream, but struggling mightily to make that leap. At some stage of the competition, it is almost unavoidable that the judge(s) face one of their students/relatives or student of their student. It is impossible to construct and re-construct the judge panel depending on who remains in the hunt.Ponbhairavi wrote:2/14/2010 Jaya T.V. carnatic music idol.
6- The judges should be selected in such a way that their relatives or disciples are not participants .It is meaningless to say that they will simply watch and not judge their wards. Their mere presence would influence the other judges. a more important thing: they might be subconsciously prompted to PULL DOWN other candidates by nitpicking on erroneous pronunciation which tantamounts to PULLING UP their own candidate indirectly.
\
NS
-
mahakavi
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: 29 Dec 2009, 22:16
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
Regarding Ponbhairavi's remarks:
Point #3: I agree that the "also-ran" candidates should be given a subsequent forum (not necessarily by Jaya TV) to show their talents in a non-competitive mode. That would be an encouragement for them to continue their passion for music.
Point #6: I agree. Naturally the parent or relative of a candidate should not sit in judgement of their ward. But saying that "so and so has recused himself from judging his child" is not enough. It is not a credit to the judge. On the other hand the identity of the candidate (as to whose daughter) should not have been revealed. Even if the judge recused himself the other judges may be inclined to judge that candidate favorably once they know the identity. The MC made a mistake in mentioning the identity of that particular candidate. If other judges know that relationship that is incidental but to make it known publicly is a little unwise.
Point #7; Saying a "sabash" while the candidate is still on the stage is OK if the candidate did well because the audience give the applause anyway. But to point out a slip especially when the candidate is still to finish the other items is a "No, No". The comment "niRaiya durbar vanduDuttu nAyakiyil" is quite an uncalled-for remark. Even established vidwans sometimes meander into closely related rAgams.
Some of my own observations:
1. The young gil anAhitA performed very well. The "nAyaki/durbar" remark must have unnerved her a bit, I thought.
2, The judges should be enabling rather than intimidating the candidates. The competition is not a test of the judge's knowledge. For example when asking a candidate to do certain neraval or swara pattern, the judge should make an effort to simplify the question at the candidate's level. After all they are nervous on the stage. To say " in that phrase do it at tisram" is like telling the candidate to read the mind of the judge. One girl (Sriranjani, I think) said after a couple of unsuccessful attempts "enakku puriyalai". That is not a blot on the candidate but an indictment on the judge who did not care to pose the question properly. Another candidate (Malathi??) was confused by an intimidating question on the neraval line on Syama sastri's kriti in Anandabhairavi. The judge should enable her rather than confuse her by asking "enda iDam?"
3. Of the judges who asked questions, I felt Neyveli was the most endearing to the candidates. While the others were not intentionally intimidating, they could tone down their attitude from a commanding mode to a conciliatory one.
4. Finally a small admonition: no negative remark from any judge while the candidate is still on stage. It affects the subsequent performance.
I can personally attest to the above point #4. In a graduate seminar I gave decades ago, a Nobel laureate (in physics) was sitting in the front row and and as soon as I started describing a phenomenon (published in a textbook) he contradicted me. That was it. It was almost downhill from there. I was so defensive that I did not make very many authoritative statements after that. At the end of the seminar I showed the textbook to my graduate advisor. He agreed with me but said "how do you disagree with a Nobel laureate?". There you go!
Point #3: I agree that the "also-ran" candidates should be given a subsequent forum (not necessarily by Jaya TV) to show their talents in a non-competitive mode. That would be an encouragement for them to continue their passion for music.
Point #6: I agree. Naturally the parent or relative of a candidate should not sit in judgement of their ward. But saying that "so and so has recused himself from judging his child" is not enough. It is not a credit to the judge. On the other hand the identity of the candidate (as to whose daughter) should not have been revealed. Even if the judge recused himself the other judges may be inclined to judge that candidate favorably once they know the identity. The MC made a mistake in mentioning the identity of that particular candidate. If other judges know that relationship that is incidental but to make it known publicly is a little unwise.
Point #7; Saying a "sabash" while the candidate is still on the stage is OK if the candidate did well because the audience give the applause anyway. But to point out a slip especially when the candidate is still to finish the other items is a "No, No". The comment "niRaiya durbar vanduDuttu nAyakiyil" is quite an uncalled-for remark. Even established vidwans sometimes meander into closely related rAgams.
Some of my own observations:
1. The young gil anAhitA performed very well. The "nAyaki/durbar" remark must have unnerved her a bit, I thought.
2, The judges should be enabling rather than intimidating the candidates. The competition is not a test of the judge's knowledge. For example when asking a candidate to do certain neraval or swara pattern, the judge should make an effort to simplify the question at the candidate's level. After all they are nervous on the stage. To say " in that phrase do it at tisram" is like telling the candidate to read the mind of the judge. One girl (Sriranjani, I think) said after a couple of unsuccessful attempts "enakku puriyalai". That is not a blot on the candidate but an indictment on the judge who did not care to pose the question properly. Another candidate (Malathi??) was confused by an intimidating question on the neraval line on Syama sastri's kriti in Anandabhairavi. The judge should enable her rather than confuse her by asking "enda iDam?"
3. Of the judges who asked questions, I felt Neyveli was the most endearing to the candidates. While the others were not intentionally intimidating, they could tone down their attitude from a commanding mode to a conciliatory one.
4. Finally a small admonition: no negative remark from any judge while the candidate is still on stage. It affects the subsequent performance.
I can personally attest to the above point #4. In a graduate seminar I gave decades ago, a Nobel laureate (in physics) was sitting in the front row and and as soon as I started describing a phenomenon (published in a textbook) he contradicted me. That was it. It was almost downhill from there. I was so defensive that I did not make very many authoritative statements after that. At the end of the seminar I showed the textbook to my graduate advisor. He agreed with me but said "how do you disagree with a Nobel laureate?". There you go!
Last edited by mahakavi on 15 Feb 2010, 01:25, edited 1 time in total.
-
bilahari
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 09:02
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
I am just watching the videos on Youtube now and am thoroughly impressed by the participants!
-
ShrutiLaya
- Posts: 225
- Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 01:15
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
I would like this very much too. I would like to listen to more from some of the non winners, esp. the girl Anuhita (spelling?) . Of course, it is hard to bring a youngster to the US but ..Ponbhairavi wrote:2/14/2010 Jaya T.V. carnatic music idol.
10- A small brochure should be made giving the biodata of the participants and their email address so that the sabhas and private individuals can, if they feel like , encourage the non winners by giving them talent promotion concert opportunities or concerts on occasions like wedding receptions ,particularly in the context that the established musicians ask for astronomic honorarium to deliver indifferent and rehearsal music much below the standard of performance of the last competitor in this programme.
\
- Sreenadh
-
meenasugi
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 14:01
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
Hello all
The competition can be viewed at http://www.cinechipz.com/tv/2010/02/12_ ... usic-idol/
Regards
Meena
The competition can be viewed at http://www.cinechipz.com/tv/2010/02/12_ ... usic-idol/
Regards
Meena
-
natakapriya
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 15 Feb 2010, 02:57
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
I thoroughly enjoyed following this program and found myself scrounging youtube daily for videos, since I wasn't available at the time that the program aired. The final few rounds especially kept me at the edge of my seat. However, I do echo Ponbhairavi's remarks - everyone who made it to the final round could have been awarded something or the other (a small recording/concert opportunity, etc.) Obviously, all of the final round participants were of a certain standard, and this would have been an encouraging gesture towards all the young artists.
-
Ponbhairavi
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: 13 Feb 2007, 08:05
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
Naree wrote:I think that the candidate still deserves a chance ..
Of course yes. the candidate deserves a chance but not the judge.Nobody who has a overall view of the carnatic music resource wealth of tamil nadu will agree with naree who thinks that It is impossible to find 10 or 12 judges who are totally neutral and unrelated by blood to these 12 young music students.
Of course yes. the candidate deserves a chance but not the judge.Nobody who has a overall view of the carnatic music resource wealth of tamil nadu will agree with naree who thinks that It is impossible to find 10 or 12 judges who are totally neutral and unrelated by blood to these 12 young music students.
-
Sam Swaminathan
- Posts: 846
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 08:45
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
First of all , thanks to adomac for uploading the series. They were all universally wonderful. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
But tell me, why is it the judges refer to the participants so disrespectfully? Participants are addressed as "nee, va, po, padu, avan, ival" etc. They sound so jarring. I have seen similar ones in Hindi channels ( bollywood songs ), they never but use expressions like Aap, aayiye, etc etc. People from deep south like Madurai and Srilanka, address their children as "vanga, ponga" and it sounds so sweet. Such exprienced artists doing the role of judges can certainly show a little more respect to the participants.
But tell me, why is it the judges refer to the participants so disrespectfully? Participants are addressed as "nee, va, po, padu, avan, ival" etc. They sound so jarring. I have seen similar ones in Hindi channels ( bollywood songs ), they never but use expressions like Aap, aayiye, etc etc. People from deep south like Madurai and Srilanka, address their children as "vanga, ponga" and it sounds so sweet. Such exprienced artists doing the role of judges can certainly show a little more respect to the participants.
-
thanjavooran
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 04:44
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
Shri Sam Swaminathan avl,
Though I agree with you in principle, the contestants are very young compared to the judges and hence are addressed in singular with great affection , besides they are kept under very casual mood. You will surprised watch how the participents are teased by Sharath in Asianet Star singer idol.
Thanjavooran
Though I agree with you in principle, the contestants are very young compared to the judges and hence are addressed in singular with great affection , besides they are kept under very casual mood. You will surprised watch how the participents are teased by Sharath in Asianet Star singer idol.
Thanjavooran
-
VK RAMAN
- Posts: 5009
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 00:29
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
I also had the same feeling like Sam. It does not matter how young a person is, it matters how they are addressed IMHOSam Swaminathan wrote:First of all , thanks to adomac for uploading the series. They were all universally wonderful. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
But tell me, why is it the judges refer to the participants so disrespectfully? Participants are addressed as "nee, va, po, padu, avan, ival" etc. They sound so jarring. I have seen similar ones in Hindi channels ( bollywood songs ), they never but use expressions like Aap, aayiye, etc etc. People from deep south like Madurai and Srilanka, address their children as "vanga, ponga" and it sounds so sweet. Such exprienced artists doing the role of judges can certainly show a little more respect to the participants.
-
mahakavi
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: 29 Dec 2009, 22:16
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
Well, in the north people go to the other extreme. I have seen servantmaids who are in their 40s and 50s address the children of the household where they work as "Ap", "AyiyE", and all other honorifics. It is just natural and nothing to crow about. Do the masters address their servants in the plural always---whether they are appreciative of their work or not?
Also I have seen people call their spouses "honey" when they are affectionate as well as angry. So it is just a formality.
As for "nI", "vA' etc., when addressed to youngsters it is a term of endearment. To me addressing a youngster as "tAngaL" confers a chasm between the two. Addressing in singular form in a soothing way is better than saying to a youngster "enna, nIngaL tappum tavRrumAgap pADugiRirgaL?" (Why, your highness is fumbling in singing such a simple song?). I will take the former anyday!
Also I have seen people call their spouses "honey" when they are affectionate as well as angry. So it is just a formality.
As for "nI", "vA' etc., when addressed to youngsters it is a term of endearment. To me addressing a youngster as "tAngaL" confers a chasm between the two. Addressing in singular form in a soothing way is better than saying to a youngster "enna, nIngaL tappum tavRrumAgap pADugiRirgaL?" (Why, your highness is fumbling in singing such a simple song?). I will take the former anyday!
-
Sam Swaminathan
- Posts: 846
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 08:45
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
Mahakavi..I appreciate your comments. But allow me to differ from you. I have seen in close quarters Srilankan parents and teachers addressing youngsters with the expressions like "vanga", "padareengala", " ukkarunga" and those words do not sound out of place. Even taking the madras tamiz as the medium of expression in Jaya TV still the language could be moderated to sound respectful while at the same time not being formal.
-
cmrasika87
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 22:32
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
I just saw the recording of Bharat Sudar. Can anyone pls help me dissect the viriboni varnam mishram part? How exactly did he split the lines into partly chatushram and partly mishram?
-
cmrasika87
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 22:32
-
srkris
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 03:34
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
cmrasika87,
Forum etiquette demands that you don't post the same message in multiple threads. Your question has already been answered at http://www.rasikas.org/forums/viewtopic. ... 38#p157038
Forum etiquette demands that you don't post the same message in multiple threads. Your question has already been answered at http://www.rasikas.org/forums/viewtopic. ... 38#p157038
-
cmrasika87
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 22:32
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
sorry about the dual post..Originally I posted my question in this thread. Waited for 2 and a half days. I didn't get any replies whatsoever in this thread..so I was forced to post the same question in another thread in the quest more replies.
-
ubari
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 05 Mar 2010, 19:42
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
People. Talking about favouritism is absurd here. If the judge (relative of a participant) had influence or rather his/her presence has influenced. The participant could ve won the title.. So no point in arguing.. The organisers are better people who DO but no simply talk HERE..
And about the DURBAR nayaki comment.. If she sang DURBAR instead of NAYAKI its her mistake right?? So there was nothing wrong in pointing it out. She herself wud ve known and thats why judges are there and it still encourages the candidate to improve.
And remember NO JUDGE just comes and sits and asks STUPID questions or GIVE stupid comments. THEY ALL ARE WELL WELL ACCLAIMED AND HIGHLY KNOWLEDGEABLE. NO rasika can comment or has any right to comment to their judging skills.
And about the DURBAR nayaki comment.. If she sang DURBAR instead of NAYAKI its her mistake right?? So there was nothing wrong in pointing it out. She herself wud ve known and thats why judges are there and it still encourages the candidate to improve.
And remember NO JUDGE just comes and sits and asks STUPID questions or GIVE stupid comments. THEY ALL ARE WELL WELL ACCLAIMED AND HIGHLY KNOWLEDGEABLE. NO rasika can comment or has any right to comment to their judging skills.
-
Purist
- Posts: 431
- Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:55
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
Ubari wrote....'And remember NO JUDGE just comes and sits and asks STUPID questions or GIVE stupid comments. THEY ALL ARE WELL WELL ACCLAIMED AND HIGHLY KNOWLEDGEABLE. NO rasika can comment or has any right to comment to their judging skills.'
Sounds like a dictatorial statement. If rasikas cannot comment or have no right thereto,
then what is the forum for? The intolerance and 'caps' acclamation suggests Ubari- you could be one of those judges
Sounds like a dictatorial statement. If rasikas cannot comment or have no right thereto,
then what is the forum for? The intolerance and 'caps' acclamation suggests Ubari- you could be one of those judges
-
Sam Swaminathan
- Posts: 846
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 08:45
Re: Jaya TV announced Concert Competition
"THEY ALL ARE WELL WELL ACCLAIMED AND HIGHLY KNOWLEDGEABLE"
And what makes you think that?! Rasikas are equally knowledgeable and have every right to question their decisions and the process by which they go about it.
And why caps? We can hear you well and clear with normal writing !!
And what makes you think that?! Rasikas are equally knowledgeable and have every right to question their decisions and the process by which they go about it.
And why caps? We can hear you well and clear with normal writing !!