
The above picture is the "pitch map" of the Arohanam/Avarohanam of Kalyani as sung by a
professor of Music. There were about 1400 samples for the total period of 20 secs or about
70 samples per second (each sample spans 14.3 msecs). "0" on the Y axis refes to 440Hz.
"-2" is the taara shadjam (S') whence "-14" is the shadjam (S). Note that this Professor is singing
at 5 kaTTai.
The top calibration numbers are the sample numbers which can be converted to time in secs by
dividing them by 70.
You may notice how inappropriate it is to notate Kalyani as;
S R2 G2 M2 P D2 N3 S' / S' N3 D2 P M2 G2 R2 S
Gamakams are vital for all CM ragas. A simple digital notation not only masks the raga pattern
but is also inacccurate about the range of fluctuations of the frequency!
Perhaps using the 22 shrutis will marginally improve the accuracy provided we develop the
necessary notations. But trying to fit an analog curve in a digital strait jacket is folly indeed!
Shruti anantam indeed!
We should consider developing a graphical notation scheme for CM ragas as well as kritis (since
the gamaka patterns are subtle and vary widely). Even the sqiggles and curls in SSP are totally
inadequate to describe our ragas truly.
Again I question the statement "shadjam and pancamam are acala swaras". There are as much
fluctuations in these notes as in other swaras. There are no fixed point(s) in CM!