I have been soaking up a bit of GNB's music, TSK's music, and much else these days. I just watched a YT video of 20+ minutes called Tanjore S Kalyanaraman Today.
It's interesting that they have described TSK's voice as not being of a timbre and richness that spells instant appeal. The best example of someone with such an appealing voice would be GNB himself.
They make two other points: TSK specialized in Vivadi ragas, invented dwimadhyama ragas, and showed great mastery of them. Vid Guruvayoor Dorai talks of how he sang Bhavani in an Amalapuram concert. MSG mentions Gangeyabhushani, Nasikabhushani etc.
Sanjay talks of how his father said TSK lacked a mass following because he sang ragas nobody knew.
WHY did TSK do it!?
I have a theory now. I do hope it's worth your time reading this.
You see... You can make an impact if you have a rich, vibrant,melodious voice.
If you happen to have a not so rich, not an instant-appeal voice, and you have mastered the grammar of CM,
you can still make an impact by introducing the surprise element for example by rendering ragas like Bhavani and Rasali and Dwimadhyama ragas.
That was the genius of Tanjore S Kalyanaraman. In other words he was a deeply creative musician who made a niche for himself by being different despite having a not-so-impactful voice.
When you remember leg spin bowlers in India, you remember Bedi as the conventional left-arm bowler. And the unconventional, highly successful, right-arm wristy BS Chandrashekhar, who could win matches single-handedly. He didn't take as many wickets as Bedi, but he was very memorable because he was different.
By the way there is a ready example of the appeal of the surprise element in CM. Listen to this raga alapana by Vid TK Rangachari!
http://youtu.be/9HMgcLTO6p0
And now your comments, please
