tODi
-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: 16 Oct 2005, 12:39
Please d/l
http://www.rogepost.com/dn/rhnm
I am sorry the speech is kannada.
Also d/l
http://www.rogepost.com/dn/ta7t
http://www.rogepost.com/dn/rhnm
I am sorry the speech is kannada.
Also d/l
http://www.rogepost.com/dn/ta7t
Last edited by Raja Chandra on 11 Nov 2006, 23:10, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: 16 Oct 2005, 12:39
matu is from Vid.R.S.Nanadakumar S/o Prof. R.Satyanarayana.
CML, lyric was already covered under JCW thread.
mahArAja jayachAmarAja oDeyar kRuti
|| mAtaMga kanyAM ||
rAga: shuddhatODi ; KaMDatripuTa tALa
|| pallavi ||
|| mAtaMga kanyAM manasAsmarAmi ||
|| marakata maNimayAMgeeM mEchakAMgeeM ||pa||
|| anupallavi ||
|| mArtAMDasannibha prabhAsahitAM ||
|| mANikyaveeNA shObhitAM lalitAM ||
|| mAtRukA svaroopAM AryAM madana vairi mAnasa nilayAM shreevidyAM||a||pa||
|| charaNa ||
|| bhadrAM chidagnikuMDa saMbhootAM ||
|| bhaMDAsurAdi daitya mathananiratAM ||
|| bhadrAdi navadEvee saMpoojitAM ||
|| bhavabhayaharaNa shaktiyutAM parashivakAMtAM ||
|| mudrAtOShitAM madAlasAM shuddha tODirAga mOditAM shAMtAM ||cha||
May be i should post it under a separate thread on R.S. Nanadakumar and post some more of his exquiste rendering.
CML, lyric was already covered under JCW thread.
mahArAja jayachAmarAja oDeyar kRuti
|| mAtaMga kanyAM ||
rAga: shuddhatODi ; KaMDatripuTa tALa
|| pallavi ||
|| mAtaMga kanyAM manasAsmarAmi ||
|| marakata maNimayAMgeeM mEchakAMgeeM ||pa||
|| anupallavi ||
|| mArtAMDasannibha prabhAsahitAM ||
|| mANikyaveeNA shObhitAM lalitAM ||
|| mAtRukA svaroopAM AryAM madana vairi mAnasa nilayAM shreevidyAM||a||pa||
|| charaNa ||
|| bhadrAM chidagnikuMDa saMbhootAM ||
|| bhaMDAsurAdi daitya mathananiratAM ||
|| bhadrAdi navadEvee saMpoojitAM ||
|| bhavabhayaharaNa shaktiyutAM parashivakAMtAM ||
|| mudrAtOShitAM madAlasAM shuddha tODirAga mOditAM shAMtAM ||cha||
May be i should post it under a separate thread on R.S. Nanadakumar and post some more of his exquiste rendering.
-
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 02:05
Here is a summary of what Sri R S Nandakumara saysSuji Ram wrote:Ramakriya,
I can understand to some extent. It will be nice if you post the translation.
I don't think there is a need to tell this to this elite audience; But because of a request, I will describe a little about the rAga shuddha tODi. shuddha tODi is the original form of present day tODi. In ancient times, tODi was was sung without panchama. Later on, this rAga transformed into janatODi ,with the use of sparing use of panchama svara. We find the rAga janatODi in Subbarama dikshitar's Sangeeta Sampradaya Pradarshini. SD has also given a has given a prabandha of Venkatamakhi in this rAga. Later on with 72 mElakartha scheme (meaning sampURnA mELa scheme), panchama was added as a true note, making it a sampUrNa rAGa giving rise to hanumatODi, as the 8th mELakarta. Thus shuddha tODi is the original form of current day tODi. This rAga can be sung in gandhAra, madhyama and dhaivata ( I presume he means with any of these swaras as graha). This is a naya rAga and the svaras ga, ma and da do not take very strong gamakas and should be sung mildly.
The mild gamakas can be clearly observed in the AlApane as well as the kriti rendition which Rajachandra has uploaded.
But a question - The SSP version on guruguha.org does not have this prabandha of Venkatamakhi - Any clues?
-Ramakriya
Last edited by ramakriya on 14 Nov 2006, 02:36, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: 11 Mar 2006, 22:41
-
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 02:05
-
- Posts: 2808
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 16:52
Actually the version I have learnt has some instances of Pa in the chitta swaram.Suji Ram wrote:Era nApai has no Pa in all the ciTTaswarAs
Also, listen to MLV's version http://www.sangeethapriya.org/~asokan/C ... -%20Oct26/
-
- Posts: 10958
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 00:01
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: 29 Oct 2005, 03:45
CM TODi = HM Bhairavi (ONLY Scalewise eqvt. gamakas are totally different!!!)
HM Bhairavi does not have bhASAMga svaras that CM Sindhu bhairavi has. The closest equivalent of CM Sindhu bhairavi in HM is Sindhi bhairavi and NOT bhairavi.
HM TODi = CM SubhapantUvarALi
CM Bhairavi has no HM equivalent and rightly so!
It is surprising that out of various pairs of HM and CM rAgas that have the same scale and almost the same movements, only a few share similar names....
HM BhUpAli tODi = CM bhUpAlam (s r2 g p d1 s- s d1 p g r2 s) (scalewise and 'movement'wise equivalent)
HM Haunsadhvani= CM Hamsadhvani (scalewise and 'movement'wise equivalent)
just to name a few.....
HM Bhairavi does not have bhASAMga svaras that CM Sindhu bhairavi has. The closest equivalent of CM Sindhu bhairavi in HM is Sindhi bhairavi and NOT bhairavi.
HM TODi = CM SubhapantUvarALi
CM Bhairavi has no HM equivalent and rightly so!

It is surprising that out of various pairs of HM and CM rAgas that have the same scale and almost the same movements, only a few share similar names....
HM BhUpAli tODi = CM bhUpAlam (s r2 g p d1 s- s d1 p g r2 s) (scalewise and 'movement'wise equivalent)
HM Haunsadhvani= CM Hamsadhvani (scalewise and 'movement'wise equivalent)
just to name a few.....
-
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 21:41
Although I havent checked thoroughly, in almost all of the earlier texts in mELa period, bhairavi is listed as under srIrAga mELa and hence is perhaps closer to CM bhairavi rather than HM. Later texts (like sangIta sudha) assign it to its own mela but do observe it uses the swaras of srIraga mELa.vasanthakokilam wrote:Bhairavi is an ancient raga, isn't it? Is there a way to discern if what the anicent texts talk about is closer to HM bhairavi or CM bhairavi? ( sorry for the digression )
Of course as I have said before, texts earlier than the mELA period are hard to correlate.
Arun
-
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 02:05
Not exactly .. Even though it is possible to sing HM bhairavi without the anyaswaras, it is customary to use the anyaswarasa rather than not use them.vrbadri wrote:HM Bhairavi does not have bhASAMga svaras that CM Sindhu bhairavi has.
The following is from Rajan Parrikar's article in sawf.org
Although Bhairavi is a major league Raga, it stands apart from other Ragas of like stature in one important way: its use of all 12 swaras, a signal feature of the Bhairavi praxis. The five vivAdi swaras that are not members of the original set are implemented judiciously, without injury to the basic Raga-swaroopa.
The very 'pure' format of bhairavi is almost non-existent, with even dhrupads using it, says Sri Jha in one of the clips in this article. He saya Sindh(i) bhairavi uses anya swaras for N and R; (thus implying no anya swaras for G, D and M).
The entire article can be read at http://www.sawf.org/newedit/edit05132002/musicarts.asp
-Ramakriya
Last edited by ramakriya on 17 Nov 2006, 01:06, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: 29 Oct 2005, 03:45
RAmakriya:
Thanks for the link. Pt. Jha does say that HM Bhairavi is a 'prAcIna' raga and was originally equivalent in scale to CM tODi and he then goes on to saying how the remaining 5 svaras came into usage...! Pretty interesting!
Hearing that I was reminded of the behAg argument wherein both the madhyamas are juxtaposed.....I have heard it both in Sindhubhairavi of CM and in CM behAg.... recently Smt. SudhA ragunAthan did (to the best of my knowledge!!!) use both the madhyamas contiguously in the rAgamAlika part of RTP-HEmavati for rAga behAg (This was in her concert at Atlanta this month).
-Badri.
Thanks for the link. Pt. Jha does say that HM Bhairavi is a 'prAcIna' raga and was originally equivalent in scale to CM tODi and he then goes on to saying how the remaining 5 svaras came into usage...! Pretty interesting!
Hearing that I was reminded of the behAg argument wherein both the madhyamas are juxtaposed.....I have heard it both in Sindhubhairavi of CM and in CM behAg.... recently Smt. SudhA ragunAthan did (to the best of my knowledge!!!) use both the madhyamas contiguously in the rAgamAlika part of RTP-HEmavati for rAga behAg (This was in her concert at Atlanta this month).
-Badri.
Last edited by vrbadri on 18 Nov 2006, 01:20, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: 30 Jun 2006, 03:08
Here's a rendition by Dr Rajkumar:
http://www.musicindiaonline.com/p/x/zJI ... As1NMvHdW/
The short alapana is quite impressive. He must have had good classical training.
http://www.musicindiaonline.com/p/x/zJI ... As1NMvHdW/
The short alapana is quite impressive. He must have had good classical training.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: 11 Mar 2006, 22:41
As far as I know Dr.Rajkumar did not undergo any classical training
SR
SR
Last edited by SangithaRasika on 16 Feb 2007, 06:28, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: 21 Oct 2006, 06:20
I've always thought Dr. Raj was miles ahead in voice modulation, classicism and emotion of renedition among singers who dabbled in both movie/carnatic music...KJY/Unnikrishnan etc. Some of the raga sangathis he sings in his songs are truly marvellous....hard to imagine that he never had any formal classical music training. He never manipulated his mouth ....hence, perhaps his voice and his sounds were both pure and pristine. Also, his pronunication of sahitya was topnotch. I'd bet that if he ever tried to sing Vatapi, there was no chance of hearing "Vaadapi"...
!

-
- Posts: 301
- Joined: 25 Oct 2005, 22:07
Ah! Had to search this out. I was listening to Kumara Ettendra's Gajavadana in Todi. So is this also in Janatodi? Panachamam seems to be used sparingly in the renditions I have heard... But what a heavenly chittasvaram!!! (Thanks to mohan for getting me addicted to it... his comment on the gamakas did it...
)
I think that the RTP/RTKs by the masters have brought out the best in Todi... RTPs SSI, MDR, MLV, GNB, RAjarathinam Pillai and MMI... and an RTK by Alathur Brothers (Bharathi Mamava)... These are the a collection of the best rendition of Todi I've heard... The krithis are majestic, but nowhere as majestic as the RTPs...

I think that the RTP/RTKs by the masters have brought out the best in Todi... RTPs SSI, MDR, MLV, GNB, RAjarathinam Pillai and MMI... and an RTK by Alathur Brothers (Bharathi Mamava)... These are the a collection of the best rendition of Todi I've heard... The krithis are majestic, but nowhere as majestic as the RTPs...
-
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 02:05
;mahesh33 wrote:I've always thought Dr. Raj was miles ahead in voice modulation, classicism and emotion of renedition among singers who dabbled in both movie/carnatic music...KJY/Unnikrishnan etc. Some of the raga sangathis he sings in his songs are truly marvellous....hard to imagine that he never had any formal classical music training. He never manipulated his mouth ....hence, perhaps his voice and his sounds were both pure and pristine. Also, his pronunication of sahitya was topnotch. I'd bet that if he ever tried to sing Vatapi, there was no chance of hearing "Vaadapi"...!
Contrary to the ideas expressed here, Dr. Raj did have some training in classical music. He came from theater where every artist was expected to be a singer. That has had a great influence on his singing.
These days Udaya TV is airing interview of Parvatamma - She has mentioned several times that her father was a music teacher, and he had taught Rajkumar too.
I heard a very nice Sri Chamundeshwari (bilahari) which he sang during a navarAtri celebration (extempore) a couple of years ago on TV. Even though the age was showing up, that had no signs of being from a film background singer

-Ramakriya
Last edited by ramakriya on 16 Mar 2007, 11:55, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: 21 Oct 2006, 06:20
Ramakriya avare,
My post was pure conjecture, based upon the carnatic leanings in his music...I have no idea whether he in fact had any training or not.
"Contrary to the ideas expressed here, Dr. Raj did have some training in classical music. He came from theater where every artist was expected to be a singer. That has had a great influence on his singing....."
just because he is able to sing doesn't necessarily mean he underwent classical training. Another point I have heard oft mentioned by people in the passing is that he did undergo classical training starting only from age 55....I have no idea if this is accurate or not. Also, whereas I am convinced of the carnatic leanings in his music, I dont think he had any pretensions to being a carnatic musician (like KJY or Unni)...other than dabbling in it to reap the benefits for the BhAvageethes and dasarpada;s he put out in his albums.... Dr Raj has never given a carnatic concert, thankfully. He is a singer who to my mind was absolutely aware of his strengths and also his limitations.
My post was pure conjecture, based upon the carnatic leanings in his music...I have no idea whether he in fact had any training or not.
"Contrary to the ideas expressed here, Dr. Raj did have some training in classical music. He came from theater where every artist was expected to be a singer. That has had a great influence on his singing....."
just because he is able to sing doesn't necessarily mean he underwent classical training. Another point I have heard oft mentioned by people in the passing is that he did undergo classical training starting only from age 55....I have no idea if this is accurate or not. Also, whereas I am convinced of the carnatic leanings in his music, I dont think he had any pretensions to being a carnatic musician (like KJY or Unni)...other than dabbling in it to reap the benefits for the BhAvageethes and dasarpada;s he put out in his albums.... Dr Raj has never given a carnatic concert, thankfully. He is a singer who to my mind was absolutely aware of his strengths and also his limitations.
Last edited by mahesh33 on 17 Mar 2007, 07:16, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 02:05
mahesh,
I agree that just because he was able to sing classical songs does not mean he underwent training. My statement was based on Parvatamma's interview where she said her father was a music teacher, and he taught Raj kumar as well. Now I am definitely not aware of the extent of training he had from his father-in-law.
I too think he never gave any kacheri as such.
I have heard that he took some training in hindustani music for sometime later in his life - but do not know if it's authenticity.
-Ramakriya
I agree that just because he was able to sing classical songs does not mean he underwent training. My statement was based on Parvatamma's interview where she said her father was a music teacher, and he taught Raj kumar as well. Now I am definitely not aware of the extent of training he had from his father-in-law.
I too think he never gave any kacheri as such.
I have heard that he took some training in hindustani music for sometime later in his life - but do not know if it's authenticity.
-Ramakriya
Last edited by ramakriya on 18 Mar 2007, 09:03, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 671
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 19:45
Can someone point me or post a version of Gajavadana? I have only heard one version by Sowmya and that was a while ago. I would like to hear those famous gandharams clearly in a well-recorded rendition that is good enough to learn from. I have heard Sriram Parsuram say in a lec dem posted on Sangeethapriya that the great T. Viswa has analyzed the gandharams in this kriti. If anyone has a rendition either by T. Viswa or by Sriram could you post?ninjathegreat wrote:Ah! Had to search this out. I was listening to Kumara Ettendra's Gajavadana in Todi. ...
Thanks much
Then Paanan
-
- Posts: 671
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 19:45
Meena
Thanks very much indeed! I was expecting to get a response in days or weeks, not minutes!
That was a great rendition by Sree SSI, though I would have personally preferred it a tad slower. The chittai swarams are very clearly recorded though my work is not going to be easy to figure out all the different gandharas that occur! The initial pallavi line is hard to make out very clearly because the line hovers around the aadhara shadja and the sruti is low as well. It is a grand kriti and I wonder if any musician has ever opened a concert with this kriti.
Are there other such kritis in this or other ragas that bring out the different shades of a single swara?
Thanks again!
Then Paanan