Sri B Ananthakrishnan - violin
Sri S J Arjun Ganesh = mridangam
Sankritilaya concert, CET auditorium, San Jose, Bay Area, California.
3 hr 30 minutes
1. vanajAkshIrO - kalyAni varNam - pUchi
2 ini oru kaNam - srIranjanI - P.Sivan (NS); neraval on pallavi line.
3. evvarE rAmayya - gangEyabhUshani - T (S)
4. sri rAmam - nArayanagowla - MD
5. hidakO bida bEda - aTANA - PD
6. bhajarE mAnasa - AbhEri - Vasudevacharya (ANST)
7. pALaya sadA- naliNakAnti - ST
8. RTP kalyani veLLai tAmarai poovil iruppAL veeNai seyyum oliyil iruppALl (Misra chapu - samam)
swarams in sUrya and behAg (transition to... 9)
9. parama purusha - behAg - nArayana tIrthA
10. mAtA ramO pitA ramachandrah (slokam) sindhubhairavi + rAmanai tharuvAi - arunAchala kavi
11. tillAnA - nirOshtA - TN Seshagopalan
12. nI nAma rUpamulaku - sowrAshtram - mangalam - T
I was delighted to get an opportunity to attend a concert on a Saturday evening after a ridiculously busy work week. And I am so glad I went!
It is easy to dismissively label Sandeep as a shishya of Sanjay and consequently build an expectation for the kind of kutcheri one might look forward to. First, it is not easy to imitate the inimitable. Sanjay Subrahmanyan is, for a better or worse, a brand. Defined by his uniqueness of presentation, wide repertoire, constant reinvention, extreme persistence, an originality in form and substance, and above all, a Thanjavur personality & Mylapore quick wittedness that one can't just conjure out of thin air. As an unabashed Sanjay admirer forumite once mentioned and quite appropriately so: idhu uzhaichu pAdara sangeetham (this is music created by sheer hard work).
Now, credit where it is due. Sandeep does an excellent display of Sanjay-isms. It is said that MDR developed strabismus by following Tiger's heterotopia. In this case however, I don't mean that the peripherals like hand and facial gestures that maketh the man.
But at the very core, Sandeep appears to have internalized Sanjay's many musical elements. And credit to him for being able to notate the un-notatable, figuratively speaking. I'm talking about Sanjay's crazy brighas and idiosyncratic sangatis. For example, in his srIranjani there are these lightning fast phrases like NDMDNSRSNDN sung as a triplet in under 100 milli seconds. Sandeep has them down to the most minute detail. I imagine that this has taken an enormous amount of effort.
I remember my grandfather and PMI having a conversation about savant mridangists, who would manage to play some sollus by some sense of approximation that brought random fingerings to fall into order and perfect timing. But they would insist that if you can't say it, you can't play it (solli kAmicha thAn vAsikka theriyum). I think singing like Sanjay is equivalent to that. Unless you know what you are doing, you can't really pull it off. Explicitly and analytically imbibing the total style of one's guru is laudable and is cause for much admiration. Now, imagine the pedagogical discipline is has taken both Sanjay and Sandeep to be able proceduralize this system of singing.
But Sandeep is proving to be a much deeper musician than just the person who managed to operationalize the Sanjay style. His professionalism, stagecraft, voice culture and several aspects of his musicianship reflect the hard work that he has put in over the years.
Sandeep's vocal range is excellent. He was able to hit the upper dhaivatam on a number of occasions today with ease; clearly this is something where his sheer tenacity and persistence have paid off. He has an excellent sense of shruti and his timekeeping/kaNakku is solid. There are a few minor imperfections, but that is part and parcel of singing risky sangatis and non-standard brighas. Sandeep could also spend more time working on enunciating; this is one of his guru's many strengths, so it shouldn't be too difficult.
Sandeep's song list reads very much like a Sanjay list. All the pieces that he chose today (well most) are tried and tested Sanjay classics. Even if there are other established versions of ini oru kaNam (KVN) or bhajarE mAnasa (DKJ), Sanjay has customized them so effectively. It would be very nice to see Sandeep expand his song selection beyond the Sanjay tropics, and I see this coming in the next few years. The last time I heard Sandeep was in Toronto in April 2012 and I can already see him having come a really long way. Oh I just found the review of the older concert here: http://www.rasikas.org/forums/viewtopic. ... an+toronto It is interesting to look back on one's own words from a few years ago!
gAngEyabhUshaNi was presented with all due importance to the placement of the R3 (shatshuti rishabam) which gives the rAgam its life, lest it should regress to mAyAmALavagowLa. Sandeep took extra care to highlight S-R3 leading up to G3 evvarE in the pallavi line. Many of his swarams had the right "poruttham" to make this connection apparent. Sandeep's KalyANi RTP was excellent, but the pallavi presentation felt a bit rushed compared to the more elaborate treatment of the rAgam/tAnam. He chose not do a very detailed trikAlam/tisram. The neraval in srIranjani was textbook perfect, but sadly, that was the only neraval of the concert.
B Ananthakrishnan is a very good violinist. My first time listening to him. He certainly has a good bowing style, one can see the BHU influence (indirectly through N Rajam and directly through his father/grandfather). I also came to learn today that he is currently training with S Varadarajan. He took the liberty to do a small graha bEdam in kalyANi today, when the vocalist did not attempt any such move. I'm sure he has every right to do so, but it just seemed a bit weird and out of place for me. Not something Varadarajan would do, for e.g. There was also a moment when he harmonized on the nishAdam during the tAnam and I think this might have thrown the vocalist's shruti off. Just a few little things to watch out for.
Arjun Ganesh's playing reminded me of early career Srimushnam Raja Rao, his paramaguru. Good use of gumki and very fluent rhythmic syntax as he accompanies compositions, although some transitions could have been more graceful. He plays a kuchi instrument with a strong resonance and ring a la Poongulam. He has an excellent nAdham and follows the vocalist with great precision. I wish he would take more risks and seek out gaps to create intelligent fillers. There were a few missed opportunities today, where I think he could have created those sabash moments for himself. He played a nice tani, but I wish he had explored more nadai variations. The running leit motif was to end with a "thAm thAm thAm" to coincide with the bha/ja/rE of the eduppu. This was very cleverly done and integrated into the various kOrvais he played in this tani. AG also happens to be my "homie" from West Mambalam

Props to Sankritilaya for their excellent and responsive organization, very pleasant and helpful volunteers and a well-run sound system. An enjoyable evening concert on a unseasonably balmy early October evening.