Soon, we may all be needing group therapy
Difficult as it is, ignoring seems to be the best solution, at least for now, if I can do that
As RSR shows, MS was very popular much before Meera. Then what is TMK talking about?shankarank wrote: ↑05 Dec 2017, 23:26
His argument seems to be: If MSS became popular through Meera, and not through her musical talent - it is fair game to use her story to popularize a different view!
A typical pappan (bhraminic) approach to let anyone talk ill of anything or do any nonsense. Best would be to ignore it !!arasi wrote: ↑06 Dec 2017, 08:49 Just as TMK never stops, we don't either, to the point we might be inspiring him to spout more![]()
Soon, we may all be needing group therapyIt's like this: instead of diverting a child or ignoring it when it starts one of its tantrums, we are doing the opposite. He 'inspires' us poetically too--ask Ponbhairavi et al!
Difficult as it is, ignoring seems to be the best solution, at least for now, if I can do that![]()
what is unfortunate ?? and who is insecure or trying to escape ?? Krishna has had no decency to provide a clarification yet on whatever garbage that he has written or spoken !!! I guess you should divert your concerns towards krishna and not against those who are condemning what has been said or written !!Anusha wrote: ↑06 Dec 2017, 10:15 Moderators,
May I request you to change the sensational 'venomous' title of this thread, to a more appropriate one?
As pointed out by Uday, it is really unfortunate to see rasikas trying to use sarcasm and wit to move away from the topic,
instead of debating the real issues raised by TMK. Insecurity and escapism at its best!
Real issue(s)? <Tambrams, the wicked caste, cruelly subjugated and appropriated the poor, subaltern MS>Anusha wrote: ↑06 Dec 2017, 10:15 Moderators,
May I request you to change the sensational 'venomous' title of this thread, to a more appropriate one?
As pointed out by Uday, it is really unfortunate to see rasikas trying to use sarcasm and wit to move away from the topic,
instead of debating the real issues raised by TMK. Insecurity and escapism at its best!
I doubt if anybody is falling for krishna's rants. All that i am saying is one need not be so highly diplomatic and submissive to what others say and trying to be just not bothered !! Condemning a wrong approach is a must, else this will spiral into a bigger issue / problem. As it is we have several and these add fuel to the fire !!arasi wrote: ↑06 Dec 2017, 10:55 Well, if being born a pAppAthi is your grouse against me, so be itSect and race haven't been my concern all through my long life. These threads are entangling us as rasikAs (whatever our origins) more than freeing us from the negativity that TMK generates.It may or may not be his intention, but we are falling for it--that's my feeling now. If it's any consolation, Tamizh poetry thread has some of our verses on this subject...
Nope.
If this Krishna fights against Sabhas and influential musicians who control the sabhas to ensure fair opportunity is given to deserving musicians and musicians are recognised timely, that will perhaps help in sustainability and inclusiveness of CM !!Anusha wrote: ↑06 Dec 2017, 16:46Nope.
(Apologies, I just realized that on my earlier post #90, I had shared some other link instead of this one below)
http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/m ... ide-72517
Nrithya Pillai’s post highlights the real issues clearly. I appreciate her confidence, maturity, and clarity of thought and expression.
At the onset, let me clarify that I don’t subscribe to all the views of TM Krishna. But, I truly believe that he has been raising profound
questions with conviction (over the last few years) for all of us (organizers, artistes, rasikas) to think over.
Well, just as everyone else, the passion for Carnatic music brings me to this forum. My knowledge of music is very limited. I listen to
a lot of different artistes in live concerts and recordings. And, I feel grateful to all of them. I am trying to learn vocal music,
in order to become a better rasika. I have also read the following music books, and gained some understanding:
1. The Madras Quartet – Indira Menon (Also had the privilege of meeting her in Delhi, and hearing her thoughts on Carnatic music)
2. Balasaraswati - her Art and life – Douglas Knight
3. The Devadasi and the Saint – V. Sriram
4. A Southern Music – T.M. Krishna
The questions raised by TM Krishna are:
- The Devadasi and Isaivellalar community has strongly influenced the growth of Carnatic music. Are artistes from these communities getting enough opportunities today?
And here is some background and some of my reflections on the first point:
- How do we make music more inclusive, enrich art?
- Given the historical background of displacement of devadasis (1947?), we have lost a whole lot of artistes and their valuable art. As true art lovers, I do believe that we need to make efforts to try and trace back the descendants of some of these families, and facilitate them to propagate their art.
- In particular, the Veena Dhanammal family has had a tremendous influence on the evolution of Carnatic music. Four artistes from this family have received the Sangeetha Kalanidhi award. It is well known that so many performing musicians till date, have learnt from the Dhanam family.
- Today, we have 2 performing artistes from the Dhanammal family – Tiruvarur Girish (vocal music) and Aniruddha Knight (Bharatnatyam). People who know them, or have seen their performances, would know about the sincerity and commitment of both these artistes in preserving their precious family art. Yet, I do wonder aloud why the Music Academy has not given them a performance slot in December season for the last 8 (or more) successive years?
- Some organizers, and artistes maybe already putting in efforts to address these. Such debates should help the others to reflect upon and open up.
- Yes, presently the artistes and rasikas are predominantly Brahmins. This was not the case few decades back. But, the objective of these debates is never to reflect upon our identities. It is in fact to think beyond and work for the enrichment of the art that we all love and revere.
You are reading the wrong books
Don't you see the obvious fallacy in this question? If we are going to make Carnatic music truly inclusive, should we be asking for opportunities by community?The Devadasi and Isaivellalar community has strongly influenced the growth of Carnatic music. Are artistes from these communities getting enough opportunities today?
How do we make music more inclusive, enrich art?
I don't think so. The art has remained. The talented ones moved to music and theatre.Given the historical background of displacement of devadasis (1947?), we have lost a whole lot of artistes and their valuable art.
This is so wrong headed. A "descendant" of an artiste won't automatically be an artiste. You are actually being casteist when you make these assumptions.As true art lovers, I do believe that we need to make efforts to try and trace back the descendants of some of these families, and facilitate them to propagate their art.
So the same academy that gave out 4 SK's to members of the family are not giving them performance slots. And you think they are automatically entitled? I cannot disagree that they are doing a great job of propagating art. But that is not what slots are given for.In particular, the Veena Dhanammal family has had a tremendous influence on the evolution of Carnatic music. Four artistes from this family have received the Sangeetha Kalanidhi award. It is well known that so many performing musicians till date, have learnt from the Dhanam family.
Today, we have 2 performing artistes from the Dhanammal family – Tiruvarur Girish (vocal music) and Aniruddha Knight (Bharatnatyam). People who know them, or have seen their performances, would know about the sincerity and commitment of both these artistes in preserving their precious family art. Yet, I do wonder aloud why the Music Academy has not given them a performance slot in December season for the last 8 (or more) successive years?
And may help you to correct your perspective.Such debates should help the others to reflect upon and open up.
Yes. We should not bother/wonder about the ancestors/descendants of any artiste. We should be able to appreciate them for their art.Yes, presently the artistes and rasikas are predominantly Brahmins. This was not the case few decades back. But, the objective of these debates is never to reflect upon our identities. It is in fact to think beyond and work for the enrichment of the art that we all love and revere.
Many Thanks for your suggestions. I will surely try to read these books. 'Wrong books' - didn't get that ?sureshvv wrote: ↑06 Dec 2017, 22:44 You are reading the wrong books
May I suggest some books that would be more informative?
1. Great Composers by Prof. Sambamoorthy
2. History of South Indian (Carnatic Music), R.Rangaramanuja Ayyangar
3. Sangeeta Ratnakaram, Same author
4. The Splendour of South Indian Music. Dr. P.T.Chelladurai
As true art lovers, I do believe that we need to make efforts to try and trace back the descendants of some of these families, and facilitate them to propagate their art.
Agree, that a descendant may not be an artiste. Let me clarify this a little more. I was having potential areas of research in mind.This is so wrong headed. A "descendant" of an artiste won't automatically be an artiste. You are actually being casteist when you make these assumptions.
Such debates should help the others to reflect upon and open up.
Absolutely. I would re-iterate that my views are of a lay rasika. I will be ever open to corrections. How about you?And may help you to correct your perspective.
Could you clarify what you mean here? I am not aware of caste-based reservations in Carnatic music.sureshvv wrote: ↑06 Dec 2017, 12:10 What is interesting is that the very same arguments were made and resulted in caste based reservations in colleges and universities, including for post-graduate education. Not many made a noise and we were happy to let things deteriorate to the miserable state it is in today.
But when it comes to Carnatic Music, we get riled up about it and are ready to make our opinions be known loudly.
Looks like we have our priorities![]()
I think you need to go back in time a little bit more for a true perspective on this ancient art. Look for the classics is my advice. Your list is too new for my liking.
I much prefer when you say "disciple" rather than "descendant" although both may be true in many instances. I think this distinction is very important to not further the caste chasm that we need to bridge.Let's take for example Mylapore Gowri ammal. If we could trace any descendant / disciple who has learnt from her, then it will be helpful for us to preserve her style/ bani.
Of course! Which is why we are having this discussion. And, by the way, most of us here are only lay rasikas. So feel free to post your opinions boldlyAbsolutely. I would re-iterate that my views are of a lay rasika. I will be ever open to corrections. How about you?
We don't have them. And we never should. Caste based reservations in any field goes only to divide us further. If not before, this should be obvious now after decades of conducting this failed experiment.
I have a different opinion. Will try to explain sometime.Caste based reservations in any field goes only to divide us further. If not before, this should be obvious now after decades of conducting this failed experiment.
Why should CM (or HM or WCM or RobindroSangeeth or yakshagAnam or sOpanam) be inclusive? Music is inclusive - believe anyone in the world has some music they like and listen and derive satisfaction/enlightenment.
Well HM has a different layam flow and a different handling of Sruti. A thoughtful CM would find it's own optimum ( is like football players worried about concussions) to avoid voice damage.Narayanan NB wrote: ↑07 Dec 2017, 16:28 while on the other hand his shruti lapses were becoming more and more unbearable. That way, performers of Hindustani music are far more sincere, keeping music and only music as the central theme.
Here is how I see it.
Nithyasree Mahadevan is dark skinned.uday_shankar wrote: ↑04 Dec 2017, 21:12 I think there's some substance to the "fair complexion" arguments. Indians of all hues are very racist and certainly "fair complexion" is a highly valued absolute. Krishna, Krishnaa (aka Draupadi) are all exceptions cited as if to prove a point. Yes, they prove that everybody else worthy of praise or adoration or reverence was "fair and lovely". Not a single character in Kalidaasa is "dark and lovely" !!
Ironically, Indians considered very "fair" in India feel insulted when they are labeled people of "color" in America. There is no end to this nonsense.
In politics, one might argue that Indira Gandhi, MGR, Jayalalitha, may have been considered less "charismatic" figures if they had been black instead of white.
Worst of all, dark complexioned people are made to feel inferior across Indian culture, much more so than "colored" people are made to feel in white lands in modern times. So while Indian "culture" has remained stagnant, western "culture" is evolving.
So that argument is not without merit.
Also, please excuse me if I don't respond to "rebuttals". My goal is never to win any "arguments", I don't have any.
Non-Brahmin musicians aren't getting slots in Sabhas during the season irrespective of the fact that the number of non-Brahmin, non-Nagaswaram artiste musicians is almost NIL.
Give Non-Brahmin musicians prime slots in Saptarishi sabhas irrespective of talent due to their caste, leading up to caste-based reservation in Carnatic Music.
He 'gives' upcoming Nagaswaram musicians junior slots in Saptarishi Sabha. Such programs are marked in Sabha schedules as being 'Sponsored by Sumanasa Foundation'. A complete list is available on his FB page.
Unless Carnatic music according to you is the atonal bovine faeces TN Seshagopalan produces, I suggest you go back and listen to Carnatic music properly. It is obvious you haven't.Narayanan NB wrote: ↑07 Dec 2017, 16:28 It would be better to focus on the numerous shruti lapses of performers that Carnatic music has come to be associated with as though lapse in shruti is one of the essence of Carnatic music.
No one turns up to a Hindustani music concert, so the musician sings like there is no one around (and there is no one around). You have conflated this with 'sincerity'.
If you want to find faults and slips in shruti you will find exactly that. Go back and listen to his music properly and learn to appreciate it as a whole without listening to it to find shruti slips and you may probably like it (but understanding is still a long way for you).Narayanan NB wrote: ↑07 Dec 2017, 16:28 But you can distance yourself and focus on music and on more serious issues related to music like lapse in shruti while you are performing.
Musicians are in essence communicators, and the message Hindustani musicians seem to send out is 'we don't want anyone here' through their boring, unpalatable, bland renditions.Narayanan NB wrote: ↑07 Dec 2017, 16:28 That way, performers of Hindustani music are far more sincere, keeping music and only music as the central theme.
Really? Bashing Brahmins is one of the easiest thing to do. No need for exemplary courage and strength to fight against the system. Others that can get you instant fame/recognition/awards (read Magsaysay etc) are making noises about India being a poverty ridden country, how minorities are treated, etc. The list is endless. Bashing Brahmins is a very old technique as old as maybe 1960s or so when the Dravidian movement started out. Correct me if I'm wrong about the decade.Anusha wrote: ↑08 Dec 2017, 10:50
It requires exemplary courage and strength to fight against the system, when we are actually part of it, and continue to work there with a resolve to address it. His quest for critical enquiry in and outside music, amazes me.
Yes, he is there in all forms of media, with provocative articles, and talks on music, social, political issues.
I haven't much, almost nil, listened to HM. So no thoughts on the applicability/veracity.Charu Venkat wrote: ↑08 Dec 2017, 17:47Musicians are in essence communicators, and the message Hindustani musicians seem to send out is 'we don't want anyone here' through their boring, unpalatable, bland renditions.Narayanan NB wrote: ↑07 Dec 2017, 16:28 That way, performers of Hindustani music are far more sincere, keeping music and only music as the central theme.
Perhaps the Indian army should consider using Hindustani Music to disperse a disruptive crowd in Kashmir/ NE India since it seems to have the effect of keeping crowds away!
And as far as crowd in HM goes just take a note of the attendance for the Sawai Gandharva Mahotsav. But it's not a social get together for NRIs who want to discuss about the taste of the food in the canteen or their latest vacations or the latest fashion trends.Charu Venkat wrote: ↑08 Dec 2017, 17:47Unless Carnatic music according to you is the atonal bovine faeces TN Seshagopalan produces, I suggest you go back and listen to Carnatic music properly. It is obvious you haven't.Narayanan NB wrote: ↑07 Dec 2017, 16:28 It would be better to focus on the numerous shruti lapses of performers that Carnatic music has come to be associated with as though lapse in shruti is one of the essence of Carnatic music.
No one turns up to a Hindustani music concert, so the musician sings like there is no one around (and there is no one around). You have conflated this with 'sincerity'.
If you want to find faults and slips in shruti you will find exactly that. Go back and listen to his music properly and learn to appreciate it as a whole without listening to it to find shruti slips and you may probably like it (but understanding is still a long way for you).Narayanan NB wrote: ↑07 Dec 2017, 16:28 But you can distance yourself and focus on music and on more serious issues related to music like lapse in shruti while you are performing.
Musicians are in essence communicators, and the message Hindustani musicians seem to send out is 'we don't want anyone here' through their boring, unpalatable, bland renditions.Narayanan NB wrote: ↑07 Dec 2017, 16:28 That way, performers of Hindustani music are far more sincere, keeping music and only music as the central theme.
Perhaps the Indian army should consider using Hindustani Music to disperse a disruptive crowd in Kashmir/ NE India since it seems to have the effect of keeping crowds away!
Oops. That’s the most unkindest cut!Charu Venkat wrote: ↑08 Dec 2017, 17:38Give Non-Brahmin musicians prime slots in Saptarishi sabhas irrespective of talent due to their caste, leading up to caste-based reservation in Carnatic Music.
I think he/she was just being sarcastic.Anusha wrote: ↑09 Dec 2017, 17:33 Oops. That’s the most unkindest cut!
Agree 100%. Like I said, I don't think that assumption was ever made.Here, you are making two assumptions :
1. All slots belong to Brahmin artistes.
Incorrect. Music is universal, it is not the possession of a single community.
Not convinced. Give us some names. We will go listen to them. And if you are right, we will petition the sabhas right from here. Sachi will do the paperworkIn fact, they are deserving. They have enriched our art, and we have been neglecting them from leading sabhas.
If translated back , that was revered - something holy. We were accommodating of some of the ills of musicians that developed overtime, because there was value in it. Including many YACMers whom we listened with patience