TM Krishna @ Krishna Gana Sabha
-
- Posts: 586
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 00:23
Shri TM Krishna - Vocal
Shri RK Shriram Kumar - Violin
Shri Umayalpuram K Sivaraman - Mrudangam
Shri Sree Sundar Kumar - Kanjira
Song List:
1) Reethigowlai Ata Tala Varnam
2) Tulasidala - Mayamalavagowlai - ONS
3) Kamakshi - Swarajathi - Bhairavi
4) Ee Vasudha - Sahana - AS
5) Chesinadella - Thodi - ANST
6) Gopa Nandana - Bhushavali - Swathi Thirunal
7) RTP in Kedaragowlai, Pallavi line : Sarasa Dala Nayane Hare Krishna, Khanda Triputa, Ragamalika Swarams in Kedaragowlai, Varali, Sama and Hamir Kalyani
8) Marubari - Javali
9) Varugalamo - Manji
10) Mangalam
A good concert with all popular Krithis. The amplification was a bit on the louder side. Neravals for Tulasidala, Chesinadella and the Pallavi were done in the usual powerful style of TMK. Sahana was well rendered. The RTP was a bit short. Marubari from the Semmangudi repertoire and Varugalamo in Manji gave a good finish. Shri RK Shriram Kumar was very good throughout. His Thodi was very nice and so were his responses in the Pallavi. Shri Umayalpuram Sivaraman played well for the songs. He played a mini Tani for the Pallavi too. Shri Sree Sundar Kumar gave able support.
http://nadasudha.wordpress.com/2007/08/ ... ana-sabha/
Shri RK Shriram Kumar - Violin
Shri Umayalpuram K Sivaraman - Mrudangam
Shri Sree Sundar Kumar - Kanjira
Song List:
1) Reethigowlai Ata Tala Varnam
2) Tulasidala - Mayamalavagowlai - ONS
3) Kamakshi - Swarajathi - Bhairavi
4) Ee Vasudha - Sahana - AS
5) Chesinadella - Thodi - ANST
6) Gopa Nandana - Bhushavali - Swathi Thirunal
7) RTP in Kedaragowlai, Pallavi line : Sarasa Dala Nayane Hare Krishna, Khanda Triputa, Ragamalika Swarams in Kedaragowlai, Varali, Sama and Hamir Kalyani
8) Marubari - Javali
9) Varugalamo - Manji
10) Mangalam
A good concert with all popular Krithis. The amplification was a bit on the louder side. Neravals for Tulasidala, Chesinadella and the Pallavi were done in the usual powerful style of TMK. Sahana was well rendered. The RTP was a bit short. Marubari from the Semmangudi repertoire and Varugalamo in Manji gave a good finish. Shri RK Shriram Kumar was very good throughout. His Thodi was very nice and so were his responses in the Pallavi. Shri Umayalpuram Sivaraman played well for the songs. He played a mini Tani for the Pallavi too. Shri Sree Sundar Kumar gave able support.
http://nadasudha.wordpress.com/2007/08/ ... ana-sabha/
Last edited by Sathej on 20 Aug 2007, 14:54, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 884
- Joined: 27 Dec 2006, 10:52
-
- Posts: 2522
- Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 16:06
I thought cut and paste was the domain of us consultants! I think I'll have to evaluate legal options here! On a more serious note, it was good to see that Krishna has almost gotten over his penchant for speeding up - I say almost because he did briefly give in to the temptation during the swaras for Thodi.
UKS' accompaniment was a revelation - his playing for the Swara jathi and Chesinadella were in complete contrast - yet both delightful in their own ways.
Close to fifty percent of the capacity crowd seemed to be below 40 - Mantra, sitting next to me, was among them. Turned out we went back a long way. Small world!
UKS' accompaniment was a revelation - his playing for the Swara jathi and Chesinadella were in complete contrast - yet both delightful in their own ways.
Close to fifty percent of the capacity crowd seemed to be below 40 - Mantra, sitting next to me, was among them. Turned out we went back a long way. Small world!
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 12:37
-
- Posts: 2522
- Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 16:06
Well Sekhar, most artistes have trouble beyond tara gandharam! I can think of very few artistes who can sing sustainied karvais/brighas beyond the gandharam. It also puts a lot of strain on the vocal chords.
On the other hand, TMK has just about the best vocal range there is in CM right now - in the KGS concert he went down to mandra nishadam and up as far as tara dhaivatham - that is 3 octaves!
In any case, my opinion is that "vocal range" is a highly over-rated strength. A Parveen Sultana can certainly stun the audience with her amazing range but what is more important is the dexterity of the voice within one's range - for example an artiste with a vibrant voice but spanning only 2 - 2.5 octaves (Sanjay for example) would almost always be more effective than a person with a good vocal range but a sluggish voice throughout it...
On the other hand, TMK has just about the best vocal range there is in CM right now - in the KGS concert he went down to mandra nishadam and up as far as tara dhaivatham - that is 3 octaves!
In any case, my opinion is that "vocal range" is a highly over-rated strength. A Parveen Sultana can certainly stun the audience with her amazing range but what is more important is the dexterity of the voice within one's range - for example an artiste with a vibrant voice but spanning only 2 - 2.5 octaves (Sanjay for example) would almost always be more effective than a person with a good vocal range but a sluggish voice throughout it...
-
- Posts: 884
- Joined: 27 Dec 2006, 10:52
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 07:04
grsastrigal-
Sure it is the same pallavi.
This isn't the first time artisties are singing the same pallavi though. The legendary "Sirandha Engaladu Nattaikurinji Enbar" has been sung brilliantly and with great gusto by a plethora of great musicians. The same goes for the ARI- created "Shankarabharananai Azhai Toid Vaadi Kalyani Darbarukku". Yet -- in each of those renderings, especially when by an accomplished musician, there is a lot to look forward to, both in terms of difference in manodharma and also in the handling of various aspects of the pallavi.
So, my point is just that just because he is singing Kedaragowlai (which, I admit, immediately brings to mind SSI's electrifying exposition of that pallavi with LGJ sir and UKS sir) does not mean he needs to sing a different pallavi. I am sure his treatment was unique. : )
As a disclaimer, I am not criticising what you said or anything; just a viewpoint.
-G
Sure it is the same pallavi.
This isn't the first time artisties are singing the same pallavi though. The legendary "Sirandha Engaladu Nattaikurinji Enbar" has been sung brilliantly and with great gusto by a plethora of great musicians. The same goes for the ARI- created "Shankarabharananai Azhai Toid Vaadi Kalyani Darbarukku". Yet -- in each of those renderings, especially when by an accomplished musician, there is a lot to look forward to, both in terms of difference in manodharma and also in the handling of various aspects of the pallavi.
So, my point is just that just because he is singing Kedaragowlai (which, I admit, immediately brings to mind SSI's electrifying exposition of that pallavi with LGJ sir and UKS sir) does not mean he needs to sing a different pallavi. I am sure his treatment was unique. : )
As a disclaimer, I am not criticising what you said or anything; just a viewpoint.
-G
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: 18 Oct 2006, 09:39
-
- Posts: 884
- Joined: 27 Dec 2006, 10:52
gsn- I agree with your point- Same pallavi of enhanced manodharma. But the two pallavis, you refer, to the "ragas related" pallavis. TMK not only repeats "SSI" kritis (3 in the above- Kamakshi,RTP, and Marubari) but repeats the pallavi too. Showing 100% loyalty to his Guru.
Once I heard TMK's Shankarabaranam- same pallavi of SSI's famous Skbm concert.
Once I heard TMK's Shankarabaranam- same pallavi of SSI's famous Skbm concert.
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 17:10
Hi I am not sure that TMK just apes his guru Semmangudi who maintained his usual tempo during the concert . On the other hand TMk does not do so at times he sings very leisurly and at times very racy and does nit seem to strike a proper balance of tempo. This is possibly because he does not plan his concert in advance. It is his style and one has no complaints on this score. But at times the interest of the listener sags and makes himor her restless instead of soothing him or her. BFN Ragjay