gAyatri venkatarAghAvan@IFA on Oct 11th,2008

Review the latest concerts you have listened to.
Post Reply
rajeshnat
Posts: 10121
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 08:04

Post by rajeshnat »

Accompanied by violin - padmA shankar , mrudangam - mannArkOil balAji & N.guruprasAd - ghatam

1. paramEsvara jagaDEEsa (R,S) - gambeeranAttai
2. sEnApathE pAlayamAm (R N S) - kAsirAmakriyA
neraval in "kanakakundala sobhita sundara"
3. KAyarOHaNesham(R) - karnAtaka devagAndhAri

4. pAarvati kumAram(s) - NaTTaikurinji
5. gOvinda rAjAya NamastE(R) - shuruTTi
6. shree kamalAMbhAyah (R) - bhairavi

7. gOvardhaNa girisham (S) - hindOlam
8A. bhajare re citta(R N S T) - kalyAni
neraval in "devIm saktibIjodbhavam atrakAarna sarEErinIm"
8B. tani

9. chetAshree bAlakrishNam - dwijAvanti
10. mAmava paTTAbhirAmA - maNIraNgu

The occassion was Muttuswami Dikshitar Day in Indian Fine Arts and hence all compositions were from MD.Muttuswami Dikshitar has given a rich history of musical precision and lyrical excellence which makes him stand so tall as a vaggeyakkara in CM. Smt gAyatri Venkat delivered with passion keeping up with the tradition of MD's excellence intact.

The start was paramEsvara jagaDeesa was excellent with a lovely alApana. gambheera nAttai vs nAttai generally strikes my neurons quite well , but to me that sounded more as nAttai possibly I was not paying much attention to her gambheera voice then, just felt she could have sung more swaras there.

I love PantuvarALi or kAshirAmakriya typically when it picks lot of tarA sthAyi wind. Here to gAyathris luck, there was more wind blowing inside as it was just beginning to rain with few doors banging once or more to add more pakkAvadyam to mridhangam. Her neraval and swara prasthAnam was excellent through out , almost equalling 2 of the best pantuvarALi(Smt premA rangarAjan and SuryaprakAsh) that I have heard in recent years . Nice to note that semmangudi's pantuvarALi is constantly challenged by few great musicians of today. She cooled well with a nice vilambakAla rendition of karnatakA devagAndhAri , I did pay lot of attention to kayArohaNesam, at few places may be(not very sure) I just did hear as kAyArOgaNesham . parvati kumAram in nAttaikurinji with a round of swaras was very good , may be more alankAram in the rAga could have added more delight.

Two long alApanais with two long krithis followed , one an unfamiliar gOvindA rAjayA in shurutti which was very good and the other more familiar bhairavi krithi which was excellent. A fast hindOlam with swaras was the low key rendition in the concert certainly the whole team did not gel well there.

Every musician's concert that is high on exertion at the top , ends with a kalyANi as a main . gAyathri sang an outstanding kalyAni alApanai avoiding all the so called droswy hotspots of kalyAni cruising beautifully with longer breath cycles and an excellent shruthi sense. Her rendition of bhajarE was brilliant ,liked her neraval that was bit less manOdharmam, but well compensated copiously in swaras .Certainly kalyANi is a tough nut to crack and gAyathri did it well in style.

Usually one hears chetAshree bAlakrishnam more in the first half with the second half belonging to his sister akhilAndeshwari . But GAyatri singing chEtashri in second half was beautifully done and was a really moving rendition. The last was fitting number , with me getting so acclimitized to the excellence of Vijayashiva in mamava pattabhi ramA , almost all renditions just do not get there .

padmA shankar was elegant throughout , taking her time in kalyANi ,beautiful nAdham in all her returns, perhaps I missed little more azhuttam in her bowing during the whirl wind tour of pantuvarAli . OUr mrudangam usually not that aggressive ,was today showing quite a lot of aggression in his play , certainly was nice .GuruprasAd's ghatam had lot of knotty variations and his tani half was more enjoyable.

On a flip side , just perhaps Smt gAyathri could have included a rare rAgam of MD like a ardraDesi or balahamsA , to that extent the thematic concert lacked few rare rAgas of MD.Also just may be instead of singing two long rAga alApanas in shuruTTI and bhairavi she could have cut atleast one in shurutti(her bhairavi rAga bhAvam is always great, not interested in trading that), may be one slOkha like some "guruguhO jayati" ;) before shurutti krithi would have made it more perfect . Overall because of this , the concert was excellent and not outstanding.
Last edited by rajeshnat on 12 Oct 2008, 17:52, edited 1 time in total.

rajeshnat
Posts: 10121
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 08:04

Post by rajeshnat »

I almost forgot to mention about IFA's secy Shri srinivAsan. He spoke before and gave lot of prizes to kids in different competition. I was extremely happy when he introduced the artists and explicitly mentioned that he would not disturb during concert and request to end with mAmava pattAbhi rAmA. HE made 2 slips one announcing lakshmi shankar as the violinist padma , and the other job hopping mannArkoil from reserve bank to madras refiniries .

Just before mAmava pattabhi ramA he came back apoligizing that he was very sorry to announce padmA as lakshmi , again connecting his intellect that lakshmi shankar is a HM musician and related to family of L VaidhyanAthan, L Shankar et al . Possibly maniraNgu was the casualty there, at times aplogising and telling sorry is the most irritating part in our life.
Last edited by rajeshnat on 12 Oct 2008, 18:21, edited 1 time in total.

vijay
Posts: 2522
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 16:06

Post by vijay »

Thanks Rajesh. It was a Deekhistar concert at IFAS - in 2005 I think - where I first heard Gayathri (maybe once before at Vani Mahal but that didn't really register). It was a phenomenal concert and drew me to attend many more subsequently - it also featured Bhajare Re Chitta...

arasi
Posts: 16873
Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 09:30

Post by arasi »

"Usually one hears chEtaSri Balakrishnam more in the first half with the second half belonging to his sister akilAnDESvari, but Gayatri's singing chEtaSri in the second half was beautifully done" :)

Good to see more reviews coming from you, Rajesh, and about fellow member Balaji's playing too...

hindolam
Posts: 87
Joined: 04 Oct 2006, 12:39

Post by hindolam »

"The start was paramEsvara jagaDeesa was excellent with a lovely alApana. gambheera nAttai vs nAttai generally strikes my neurons quite well , but to me that sounded more as nAttai possibly I was not paying much attention to her gambheera voice then, just felt she could have sung more swaras there."

When was parameswara ever in Gambeera Natai? it was always in Natai only. Cant understand what the writer says when he is talking about it being in gambeera natai. The two ragams are so different in colour and character.

rajeshnat
Posts: 10121
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 08:04

Post by rajeshnat »

hindolam wrote:"The start was paramEsvara jagaDeesa was excellent with a lovely alApana. gambheera nAttai vs nAttai generally strikes my neurons quite well , but to me that sounded more as nAttai possibly I was not paying much attention to her gambheera voice then, just felt she could have sung more swaras there."

When was parameswara ever in Gambeera Natai? it was always in Natai only. Cant understand what the writer says when he is talking about it being in gambeera natai. The two ragams are so different in colour and character.
Good catch !!!I just referred a pdf of MD krithis. It is actually put as chAla nAttai, In hindsight I slipped I must have meant chAlanAttai. Of course still dont know how different is chAlanAttai from NAttai (apart from the obvious mela-janyA rAgam connection)

parameshvari jagadIshvati
parame´svara jagad¯ı´sa
r¯agam. : calan¯at.a (36) t¯al.am. : adi
pallavi
parame´svara jagad¯ı´sa ´sa˙nkara p¯ahi m¯am. pran. at¯artihara ´sr¯ı
anupallavi
purahara mr. gadhara sundare´svara dharmasam. vardhan¯ımanohara
caran.am
paËœncanad¯ı´svara ga˙ng¯adhare´svara pannag¯abharan. a bhaktajan¯avana
pa˜ncabrahmahaty¯adip¯apahara para´sivatatv¯arthabodhitacatura
pa˜ncanadaks.etraprabh¯akara p¯alitaguruguha bhavabhayahara
v¯ıra ks.etrap¯alavinutacaran. a vicitrayamabhay¯adiniv¯aran

sureshvv
Posts: 5542
Joined: 05 Jul 2007, 18:17

Post by sureshvv »

rajeshnat wrote: Of course still dont know how different is chAlanAttai from NAttai (apart from the obvious mela-janyA rAgam connection)
Quite different. Not easy to confuse the two of them. May be the pdf is dated or dubious.

Post Reply