K Gayathri - S P Ananthapadmanabha - S J Arjun Ganesh

Review the latest concerts you have listened to.
Post Reply
srikant1987
Posts: 2246
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 12:23

Post by srikant1987 »

6 Jan 2010 @ Music Club IIT Madras
as part of Youthfest 2010 concert series

sarasijanAbha (varNam) - kAmbhoji - aTa -
cintadIrcarA! - saurAShTram - Adi - Ramnad Srinivasa Iyengar {RSI} (S)
maRivEre dikkevvaru? - latAngi - khaNDacApu - PSI (RNS)
nIrajAkShi - hindOLam - rUpakam - MD
aDugarAdani - manOranjani - Adi - T
saraguNapAlimpa - kEdAragauLai - Adi - RSI (RNS)
small tani

RTP in kharaharapriya - tishratripuTa (mishranaDai, 2-kaLai)
"tyAgarAjarE umakkIDevarE? lOkamE ennALum pADumE un kIrtanamE!"
big tani

nIlavaNNanE - brindAvani - mishracApu - SP (?)
mangalam

Sathej
Posts: 586
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 00:23

Post by Sathej »

The Pallavi - Thyagarajare umakkinai evvare Lokame ennalume paadume un keerthaname, was set to Tisra Triputa Talam Misra Nadai, cannot be classified as 2 Kalai.

It was a nice concert. The Lathangi Alapanai had some fine Brigas. Liked the Manoranjani filler. The main Kedaragowlai was delivered well too. The challenging Pallavi was sung elaborately with Trikalam done. The concert, by itself was unhurried. The accompanists played a good role, the thani for the Pallavi was done very well.

A satisfying Pallavi exposition!

Sathej
Last edited by Sathej on 07 Jan 2010, 23:07, edited 1 time in total.

srikant1987
Posts: 2246
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 12:23

Post by srikant1987 »

cannot be classified as 2 Kalai.
Well, I meant 2-kaLai in the same way as "brahmamokaTe" would be 1-kaLai and, say, "birAna varAlicci brOvumu" would be 2-kaLai.

rbharath
Posts: 2333
Joined: 05 Feb 2010, 10:50

Post by rbharath »

srikant1987 wrote:
cannot be classified as 2 Kalai.
Well, I meant 2-kaLai in the same way as "brahmamokaTe" would be 1-kaLai and, say, "birAna varAlicci brOvumu" would be 2-kaLai.
:|

the increasing or decreasing of kalapramanam cannot make it one-kalai or two-kalai..
the beat that was used to demonstrate is what matters.

just because the talam is put slow or fast, thus making the song run or drag cannot shift it from one-kalai to two-kalai or viceversa. it will stay as it is only.

atleast that is what i understand of 'kaLai' as such. experts could comment.


i think srikant is confusing between 'kaLai' and the mEl kAlam/kIzh kAlam shiftings..

srikant1987
Posts: 2246
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 12:23

Post by srikant1987 »

One thought that in one avartana of tishra-jAti tripuTa tALam, if someone sings 7 x 7 = 49 mElkAla swarams (taking kArvais to be number of swarams that could've been sung in their stead), it's 1-kaLai mishranaDai, and if one sings 98 mElkAla swarams, it's 2-kaLai mishranaDai.
Last edited by srikant1987 on 09 Jan 2010, 14:31, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply