Suryaprakash@OLI chamber on Oct 06th,2012

Review the latest concerts you have listened to.
Post Reply
rajeshnat
Posts: 10121
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 08:04

Suryaprakash@OLI chamber on Oct 06th,2012

Post by rajeshnat »

Suryaprakash@OLI chamber on Oct 06th,2012
----------------------------------------------------------------
Vocal : Suryaprakash
Violin : MA Sundareshwaran
Mrudangam : Thanjavur Ramadas
Narration : Vidushi Bharathi ramasubban with right touch of guidance and support by Smt Gowri ramnarayanan

Concert duration/Day : 2 hrs and 40 mins /Saturday
Concert Type : Nirvana (no concert to follow)
Occassion : Tribute to Madurai Mani Memorial
Hall : ambalam,kalakshetra colony

Oli chamber concerts have a special charm. What you hear is a mikeless unadulterated music. There is intimacy with rasikas and most importantly the team work of performing musicians are more felt as they have to be extremely watchful in getting every sangathi right, if I could say there is "watchful presence"

I have had a chance to attend 6 months back an oli chamber concert of V sumitra at rasvihar. While rasvihar is an enclosed hall, but Ambalam has the size of say 1/3rd of a ragasudha , with two ends having kind of open air effect , the ambience for a rasika is better at ambalam (as I have more natural breeze), but the vocalist has to pump in with more sustained power . Incidentally for a open throated musician like suryaprakash it just comes naturally and shows he is one of the fewest who can sing without the clutches of mike that too in a semi open air hall.

Vidushi Bharathi ramasubban gave crisp introductions for every aspect of MMI. And for every crisp snippet of context , there was a sound backup of musical content. Ms ramasubban gave an introuduction of HMB's influence, manodharmam of MMI , how mmi's intermediate silences vs fragments added charm for his music, MMI's thamizh isai , the sentiments of mmi like taking only mangalagaramAna krithis , laya patterns of MMI seguing with ragamAliga swaras, thukkkadas of mmi etal. Every introduction by vid bharathi was crisp,succint and had a heavy tanglish (thamizh and english was liberally used , sorry Nick you must have got only half of that :tmi: ). I particularly also liked when Smt Gowri Ramnarayanan added a snippet of anecdotes where she read from snippets of amarar kalki review of MMI(Smt gowri is such a gifted speaker :clap: ).

Putting the prose context aside let us move on with musical content:
-------------------------------------------------------------
1. vAgEEShwari vAni saraswathi (RS,N,S)- saraswathi - HMB
4 mins neraval in "neeve jeeva shakthi neeve gnana murthi??"
and 2 mins swaras

2. evaroora ninnu vinA (R,S) - mohanam - T
4 mins alapana without violin return and 4 mins of swaras

3A. Snippets of kharaharapriya alapana by suryaprakash to indicate logical progression of mmi sangathis where despite there is fragments, there is also a wholesomeness for every subset of patterns.

3B. pAmAlai ini UNDO (N)- harikAmbOdhi - Psivan
brief neraval in "thamizhnadu sei thava pazhanai vandavar"

4. sogasu jooda tharama (R ,S) - kannadagowlai - T
5 mins alapana and 2 mins violin return
4 mins swaras

5A. meenAkhsi mE mudham (R N S T)- gamakakriya - MD
15 mins alapana and 5 mins violin return
14 mins neraval in "madhurApuri nilayE mani valayE"
5 mins swaras

5B. tani for 5 mins

The start in saraswathi brought in early excellence and from there on there was no looking back. Saraswati contours was meditative with an early neraval in neeve jeeva shakthi just bought in total teamwork. Mohanam was lovely the chisel of short cycle burst of alapana and swaras with an extremely brilliant support by Ramadas(mikeless lovely nAdham) added intense virtuosity that was very much there with the team.

Then Smt gowri ramanarayanan read in thamizh the snippets of review by amarar kalki and how MMI was considered not that perfect then and how many felt MMI used to have fragmented sangathis . Suryaprakash particularly took an example of how MMI handles where in he gave a contextual example of how a series of small steps leads to a vishwaroopa sangathi effect .

The filler was not the usual breakneck kannadagowlai (ora jupu), but instead it was mildly tempered sogasujuda tharama . Particularly more than the swaras I was particularly happy to hear an alapana of kannadagowlai.

The concert peaked at the right time . Right peak time to me is the main or the RTP and indeed it was a fine gamakakriya (with pa da sa distinct prayogam). He built a mini gopuram layer by layer in gamakakriya during alapana , with a crisp return by MAS it was perfect . With a brilliant madhurapuri nilayE neraval - topped with exceptional sahithya clarity, weight and throw of his voice and most importantly patterns were very very original.There was not an iota of any mimicking from any 1960 golden period vidwans . Swaras were measured in main , but with minimal violin return it was a brilliant demonstration of vidwat by Suryaprakash.

rajeshnat
Posts: 10121
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 08:04

Re: Suryaprakash@OLI chamber on Oct 06th,2012

Post by rajeshnat »

6.RTP-shankarAbharanam for 40 mins
Talam - tisra triputa
Pallavi line "manda hAsa vadanA hare krishnA"
Ragam for 14 mins
Tanam for 10 mins without and with mrudangam
pallavi + swararagamaliga for 16 mins in shankarAbharanam + suddhadhanyAsi+ behag + KAnadA

7A. veyOru thOli pangan - kapi + bhimplas
7B. kandan karunai pozhiyum - bhimplas - guhan
8. Note -shankarAbharanam -hmb
9. vazhiya senthamizh - madhyamAvati - bharathiyar??

After a near 50 minute main, I certainly didnot anticipate back to back pallavi that too in a super ghana ragam like shankarabharanam . I thought he was taking too much risk in taking shankarAbharanam , considering it is a mikeless concert - that too with just 5 mins of tani.

Suryaprakash in my opinion is very branded as MMI-TVS school. But what is always deceptive/unknown is, he has also taken from SSI school .His first guru thirukkodikaval rajamani was a disciple of SSI. Every second generation disciples of SSI are all great performers of today. Shankarabharanam was sustained classicism at its best , the madhyamakala long tanam for 10 mins without and with mrudangam was a more semmangudish touch reminded of navarathi mandapam concerts. The pallavi was in tisratriputa , swara patterns were brisk in shankarabharanam and the ragamaliga tsunami started with suddhadhanyasi , behag and kAnadA . The patterns were all too original , I have heard him sing atleast 15 times behag in ragamaliga and how original and fresh was his manodharmam.

After nearly 100 minutes of non stop sangathi after sangathi ride , tukkadas were immaterial to me . veyoru tholi pangan in kapi was superb and ending with parashakthi arut chudar vel in 5th gear was lovely in guhan's kandan karunai . I did not care much about note and vazhiya senthamizh. as to me the concert got over before.

Few words about MAS and Ramadas:
--------------------------
MAS is brilliant , at times he has a tendency to intrude during vocal rendition, since it was a mikeless it was not felt . His play in poorvikalyani where he dwelled bit slowly to bring in the intense karuna rasa bhavam and his fast cut bowing during thanam just reminded the rasayana concert of RSP-MAS-RSankaranaryanan@manakkal rangarajan's house that they gave 6 years back. Suryaprakash kodu pOtta MAS double road pOttAR. ^^^ vvv

Ramadas was a tad slower, and incidentally suryaprakash understood that aspect and did not bowl any fast swaras like say ora jupu (he preferred sogasuda tharama) or a sarasa sAma dhAna.Barring fastest swaras in ragamaliga, overall it was in line with ramadas style . Shri ramadas use of toppi was superb . Ramadas was very creative during poorvikalyani it was a 3 way round of sangathi play, one sangathi sung by Suryaprakash , a replay by MAS without mridangam and then second replay by Thanjavur ramadas where mrudangam was also singing. Tani was just brief and I liked it as he in general gave more way for vocal content.

OLI and few WOW WOW moments:
----------------------------------------
# Concert after concert year after year , the excess sound amplification is always felt by rasikas . One main reason the performing vidwans at stage jack up the feedback monitor volume as they cite they cannot hear , and in that step it becomes a "jeopardy" for the rasikas .

# OLI goes back to FIRST PRINCIPLES , the performing musicians indeed hear and with that limited hearing each of the percussionist is very watchful. Thanjavur ramadas callibrated wonderfully. RamadAs,while playing for Suryapraksh had a right sound (in line with vocal power), but during violin return it is feather touch creating an atmosphere of hearing natural nAdham without competing for organized cacophony.

# Having said that it may not be practical to have musical concerts without mike , but certainly musicians can curtail their "DIL MAANGE MORE" attitude of volume . To put a long story short with intuition ,musical skills and faint hearing performers can achieve musical perfection without elbowing on rasikas ears.

#Prior to mohanam, Bharathi ramasubban talked about fragment sangathis and intermittent silences of MMI, I did not get what she said in words. Suryaprakash specifically demonstrated how Sangeetha Bhoopathi Maharajapuram Vishwanathas Iyer sings with his extensive brigas in Mohanam during alapana and then he took up the exact same set of sangathis and demonstrated how MMI sings mohanam in his fragmented way and he showcased how both reached the same brilliant end point. It was right specific context with an appropriate musical demonstration. :!:

# Singing without fatigue that too back to back colossal meenakshi memudham main followed by ghana raga pallavi in shankarabharanam with downpour of ragamaliga swaras with only 5 min tani in between shows the "musical virtuosity and endurance" of Suryaprakash

# I have not heard an alapana or I cannot recollect how kannada gowlai sounds during alapana. IT was nice , it looks like it is very close to Abheri.

# I had a chance to drop Ramadas sir and MAS as I saw them looking for auto . I particularly cherish the talk that I had with Ramadas sir where he told few things about how PMI influenced him and how he faithfully follows his school. Thanjavur ramadas told me how he takes care of his mrudangam(s). Ramadas is a very underrated mrudangist in the circuit.

Only one hiccup:
----------
- For the first number the violin was not heard that much ,the culprit was radel shruthi volume which was reduced .

OLI Team is doing a fanta -fabulous job.THEY ARE REMINDING MUSICIANS THAT THEY SHOULD NOT ASK MORE VOLUME IF MIKE IS PROVIDED :grin: :grin: . RSP-MAS-Ramadas reminded MMI-MSG-PMI atleast in their musical skills and virtuosity. Smt Gowri summed up well in her last speech.
Overall an excellent to outstanding concert for 2 hours and 40 mins.

mahavishnu
Posts: 3341
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 21:56

Re: Suryaprakash@OLI chamber on Oct 06th,2012

Post by mahavishnu »

Thanks, Rajesh. Very nice and informative review.
Ramdas is a top-class mridangist. The only one left with the true PMI nadham from his carefully crafted instrument.
He has imbibed the best of PMI's style as the last person to do a full gurukulavasam with him.

For some reason he did not get all the breaks he deserved in his youth.
Last edited by mahavishnu on 08 Oct 2012, 04:37, edited 1 time in total.

Nick H
Posts: 9472
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 02:03

Re: Suryaprakash@OLI chamber on Oct 06th,2012

Post by Nick H »

There was only one disappointing feature of the concert: the turnout. Mooted that it is a long way for some people, but then, everywhere is a long way for someone. Ambalam is a really great place for music, and with so many rasikas coming from places in between, is one M from Mambalam to Ambalam such a long way to travel?

Rajeshnat has really said all that needs to be said, and I can only add a little subjective response. It was a really very great concert. It was more than "nirvana," because it was not only without limit but also without mic. I can say just a few words: far-reaching melody of great beauty from Suryaprakash and Sundareshwaran, and percussion of great dignity and beauty from Thanjavur Ramadas. "Dignity," is the word that came into my head as I listened to his playing, which added weight and grounding. "Subtlety," is the word that came into my head as I listened to Sundareshwaran. I don't have any words for Suryaprakash: I always enjoy his concerts, this one left me speechless! SP's wife commented to me that I had listened to most of the concert with my eyes shut: it was indeed deeply moving.

Just one further note on the "facts" front: generally the Oli concerts have been of two hours duration: SP gave us 2hrs 40 mins, embarking on an RTP where most others would have been embarking on Mangalam.

Not all vocalists are really able to be heard/appreciated in other than a small room. I didn't expect any problems, and didn't have any, with SP. We were talking about climate before the concert, and I asked him if hot, cold, wet, dry gave difficulties with his voice. He said that the solution to all those problems is to sing from the heart, not from the throat. He most certainly fully sang from his heart yesterday.

The Oli series was planned to be 24 concerts over a period of one year. I know I am not the only one to have begged the team not to stop!

arasi
Posts: 16873
Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 09:30

Re: Suryaprakash@OLI chamber on Oct 06th,2012

Post by arasi »

The more I hear of OLI chamber concerts, the more I miss not being there in Chennai :(

Surya was in his element, Sundareswaran was there by him, and though my understanding of the intricacies of layam is indeed poor,along with the experts, I do like Ramadas's playing very much and have always wondered how unobtrusively he commands one's attention to rhythm. Even the greats sometimes have grated my ears by 'going loud'. Not once in all the concerts in which have I heard Ramadas has this happened.

Thanks, Rajesh for your inspired review.
Hope we do get to hear snippets--kannaDa gowLai for instance...

maduraimini
Posts: 477
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 02:55

Re: Suryaprakash@OLI chamber on Oct 06th,2012

Post by maduraimini »

Thank you Rajesh for the review. I would like to hear Suryaprakash in person, but he has not come to Florida, and when I am in California, he is not there. I have listened to his cassettes and love his voice and the songs. Hope to hear his concert in person some time in the future.

S.NAGESWARAN
Posts: 1076
Joined: 11 Feb 2009, 08:54

Re: Suryaprakash@OLI chamber on Oct 06th,2012

Post by S.NAGESWARAN »

Dear Rasikas,

It is almost a year now that I haven't attended any live concert due to health problems.

Resently I have renovated my home with a moderate sized hall suitable for conducting mikeless [or mike with minimum volume as Sri Rajeshnat mentioned] concerts.

I request the organisers of Oli chamber concerts to consider my offer to hold the concerts at my home.

My residential address will be;
OLD NO 21/NEW NO 12,
Srinivasa Pillai Street,
West Mambalam,
Chennai - 600 033.

S.NAGESWARAN.
08.10.2012.

rajeshnat
Posts: 10121
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 08:04

Re: Suryaprakash@OLI chamber on Oct 06th,2012

Post by rajeshnat »

Nick
Great post. I think ambalam is like mini ragasudha , lovely ambience and sound setup. Access is difficult other than those around kalakshetra who know this place. The place needs more publicity. Looking back ,May be OLI team or artists could have shelled out that minimum amount to advertise in engagement column in the hindu for this concert which they did not do.

Ambalam can host may be upto 150 to 200 and I am sure with vidwan Tv Ramprasadh (patron of ambalam), it is just going to surely happen soon. Rasikas of kalakshetra colony/Besant nagar need not come to mile apore.

Nick H
Posts: 9472
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 02:03

Re: Suryaprakash@OLI chamber on Oct 06th,2012

Post by Nick H »

OLI has not advertised to the public anywhere, I don't think: this forum is the closest. Most of their concerts are held in rooms not much bigger than a living room --- often, in fact, living rooms! They have a group of people who, in greater or lesser, or always sufficient, attend each program. Perhaps, Ambalam is a little bit too big for them.

Rasikas of Besant Nagar, Kalakshetra, Thiruvavanmiyur (Leave the van parked, Thiru, we staying in your ur tonight!) have regular concerts at several local venues. There should have been enough locals to fill the hall.

Going the extra myal can be tough, sometimes. I miss many concerts in T Nagar, etc, since the diversions and traffic have made it so tough to drive there.
It is almost a year now that I haven't attended any live concert due to health problems.
This is not only sad for you, but it is sad for us not to see you too. Please email the OLI team at [email protected].

I will always fight the traffic problems to come to a concert at your house.

Post Reply