Music is a source of relaxation and enjoyment for listeners, not a curriculum or vocation. What I like is my choice. If a large number of people listen to a musician, it is their choice. Is it right to pass any value judgment on it? If fewer people listen to another musician, is there any way we can force a larger attendance? Even when offered free, there is no increase in attendance often. It is another matter to draw attention to a musician that has not been noticed.
I enjoy what I enjoy and another does to his liking. Is there any way to say that enjoyment of X is superior to enjoyment of Y?
If someone prefers vocal to instrumental, it is a question of personal preference.
Similarly, if many do not quite get in line with a thani, it is their problem. While it is indecorous to walk out as the thani starts, is there a way to force anyone to like it?
Some comments in the forum made me think aloud on the above lines.
What music one prefers
-
VK RAMAN
- Posts: 5009
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 00:29
Re: What music one prefers
Rasikas like or dislike to one or more artists is influenced by parents, friends, proxity to concert, artists demeanor, + singing melody and bhavam. Those who listen to only certain artists are like a frog in a pond.
-
Purist
- Posts: 431
- Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:55
Re: What music one prefers
As for Thani, it largely stems from the fact a majority are ignorant of aspects of " laya ".kvchellappa wrote: If someone prefers vocal to instrumental, it is a question of personal preference.
Similarly, if many do not quite get in line with a thani, it is their problem. While it is indecorous to walk out as the thani starts, is there a way to force anyone to like it?
Some comments in the forum made me think aloud on the above lines.
The max they may know what thalam is it. After keeping the beats for a small time the interest fades.
Some laya knowledge is essential to be engrossed all thro' the thani. If not they are "Thani"
separate).