Sangita Kalanidhi-2008?
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 16:56
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: 24 Oct 2006, 04:18
It is sad that, campaigning for awards and titles has taken such levels. I was always told that a lot campaiging happens behind the scences. The big question is "In all fairness to other distinguished vidwans, who might be equally deserving of such awards, Is the " Sruthi Magazine" going to carry out editorial articles???mohan wrote:An article in the latest issue of Sruti canvases the award for TH Vinayakram.
-
- Posts: 846
- Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 08:45
Let us for a moment forget the claims of "campainging" and focus on what Sri Vinayakaram has achieved in his career.....He has brought to the world stage a little known instrument, a mere clay pot, to what it is to-day. He is solely responsible for that. This is an achievement which should be recognised with out attributing any motives or machinations. In my opinion Sri Vinayakaram is an excellent choice. It is definitely long over due.
Last edited by Sam Swaminathan on 04 Jun 2008, 02:07, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: 08 Apr 2007, 08:19
In view of the very large pool of deserving carnatic musicians, I am again recommending, as I did in previous years, that the Music Academy should make TWO awards every year, one for a vocalist and one for an instrumentalist. Otherwise many deserving artists will disappear from the scene before they are recognised, if the current regional/instrumental/ etc. quota/rotation system continues to be follwed. If this suggestion is followed, then my recommendation would be for both TVR and Vikku.
-
- Posts: 16873
- Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 09:30
Sam,
I agree with you. Vinayakram is indeed a super choice.
Sundara Rajan raises another valid point. The Cleveland Festival showcased many a veteran and made us focus on the merits of senior vidvAns. But for a few among them, though they deserve the honor, many are not going to be given the title. One vocalist and one violinist (or percussionist in alternate years) is a good idea. Considering the women artistes pool, it would be even better if they make it a point to choose a woman (in any of the categories) every year.
I agree with you. Vinayakram is indeed a super choice.
Sundara Rajan raises another valid point. The Cleveland Festival showcased many a veteran and made us focus on the merits of senior vidvAns. But for a few among them, though they deserve the honor, many are not going to be given the title. One vocalist and one violinist (or percussionist in alternate years) is a good idea. Considering the women artistes pool, it would be even better if they make it a point to choose a woman (in any of the categories) every year.
-
- Posts: 382
- Joined: 15 Aug 2006, 22:12
Although I am admittedly biased on my slant for mridangam artists, I think Karaikudi Mani is due for serious consideration. He has definately established a bani that is extremely popular and will stand the test of time. He also has made very strong efforts to popularize carnatic music with his Sruthi Laya groups. He also maintains an impressive number of students.
-
- Posts: 374
- Joined: 07 Sep 2006, 14:18
Sankaran is also due then, for his efforts in propagating the pudukottai school of mrudangam and pazhani anna's style of playing. He also bought great awareness of Carnatic music to North America, having been based in Toronto for the past 35 years or so. THV is also another fine choice, although I hear that the Academy is leaning towards giving TVR the title this year.
Last edited by sankirnam on 04 Jun 2008, 07:25, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 16873
- Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 09:30
-
- Posts: 2808
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 16:52
I think it is unlikely they would award two Sangeetha Kalanidhi-s in one year as the Kalanidhi presides over the Annual conference as well.
Recently they have introduced the Sangeetha Kala Acharya award which has gone to TH Vinaykram, M. S. Anantharaman, PS Narayanswamy, SR Janakiraman, Tanjavur Sankara Iyer, Sulochana Pattabhi Raman, Seetha Rajan and others. The academy is quite happy to award more than one Acharya award per year.
I am not sure if the Academy would be inclined to awarding the SK to a previous SKA receipient.
Recently they have introduced the Sangeetha Kala Acharya award which has gone to TH Vinaykram, M. S. Anantharaman, PS Narayanswamy, SR Janakiraman, Tanjavur Sankara Iyer, Sulochana Pattabhi Raman, Seetha Rajan and others. The academy is quite happy to award more than one Acharya award per year.
I am not sure if the Academy would be inclined to awarding the SK to a previous SKA receipient.
-
- Posts: 16873
- Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 09:30
Points taken, Mohan. Yes, sangeetha kala acharyas have been awarded to women too and will continue that way, it seems. However, those awards are given mainly to scholars who are teachers at universities and music institutions.
For those who cannot come under that category but merit an award by their excellence in performance can be given an award by another name (since two cannot preside over the sadas as you say, though Madame Clinton would inform us otherwise!).
For those who cannot come under that category but merit an award by their excellence in performance can be given an award by another name (since two cannot preside over the sadas as you say, though Madame Clinton would inform us otherwise!).
-
- Posts: 382
- Joined: 15 Aug 2006, 22:12
sankirnam,
I agree that Sankaran is more than deserving, but I'm not sure if MA considers living in NA as a plus or minus. He certainly remains one of the leading artists. After those two, I'd put Dorai and Raja Rao next (in no order between the two). Raja Rao, in addition to his own expertise, has trained a tremendous number of talented artists, and Dorai's accomplishments are up to par.
I agree that Sankaran is more than deserving, but I'm not sure if MA considers living in NA as a plus or minus. He certainly remains one of the leading artists. After those two, I'd put Dorai and Raja Rao next (in no order between the two). Raja Rao, in addition to his own expertise, has trained a tremendous number of talented artists, and Dorai's accomplishments are up to par.
-
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: 05 Feb 2010, 10:50
I guess, Acharya is a way of recognising people who wont get kalanidhi.. hence, PSN, TRS, SRJ, MSA et.al are ruled out for kalanidhi.
in 2007 season, it was Sri Palghat Raghu. Hence, there will not be a percussionist this year. definitely not!
It should most probably be a vocalist or some other instrumentalist.
in 2007 season, it was Sri Palghat Raghu. Hence, there will not be a percussionist this year. definitely not!
It should most probably be a vocalist or some other instrumentalist.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: 12 Jan 2007, 04:10
-
- Posts: 1896
- Joined: 28 Sep 2006, 02:15
http://www.musicacademymadras.in/kalanidhis.html
Most probably it will be a vocalist this year.
Most probably it will be a vocalist this year.
-
- Posts: 2522
- Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 16:06
I agree - Ravikiran would be a great choice. TVR would probably be a shoo-in based on seniority but the Academt has stuck to a cycle in recent times:
2007 - PR
2006 - TNS
2005 - MC
2004 - VR
2003 - TVS
2002 - Sikkil Sisters
2001 - UKS
So the cycle is something like vocalist-mrudangist-melodic instrumentalist. Using that funda, it could well be Ravikiran - would be refreshing to see an artiste get the award in his prime and none more deserving than Ravikiran.
If the pattern above continues it will surely be TVR next year.
2007 - PR
2006 - TNS
2005 - MC
2004 - VR
2003 - TVS
2002 - Sikkil Sisters
2001 - UKS
So the cycle is something like vocalist-mrudangist-melodic instrumentalist. Using that funda, it could well be Ravikiran - would be refreshing to see an artiste get the award in his prime and none more deserving than Ravikiran.
If the pattern above continues it will surely be TVR next year.
-
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: 05 Feb 2010, 10:50
if it has to be a melodic instrument.. then academy should be looking at people like VVS or T Rukmani or KSG or Nagai ? unless it should be surprise like 2002.
i dont think people like Ravikiran and E Gayathri will be considered this early. knowing academy, they will all be made to wait for there turn for many more years...
i dont think people like Ravikiran and E Gayathri will be considered this early. knowing academy, they will all be made to wait for there turn for many more years...
-
- Posts: 320
- Joined: 13 Dec 2007, 17:17
I think SKN .Mani krishnasamy was earlier SKA.(telling from memory)mohan wrote:I think it is unlikely they would award two Sangeetha Kalanidhi-s in one year as the Kalanidhi presides over the Annual conference as well.
Recently they have introduced the Sangeetha Kala Acharya award which has gone to TH Vinaykram, M. S. Anantharaman, PS Narayanswamy, SR Janakiraman, Tanjavur Sankara Iyer, Sulochana Pattabhi Raman, Seetha Rajan and others. The academy is quite happy to award more than one Acharya award per year.
I am not sure if the Academy would be inclined to awarding the SK to a previous SKA receipient.
-
- Posts: 2808
- Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 16:52
Here is the list of recipients of the Sangeetha Kala Acharya award http://www.musicacademymadras.in/kalaacharya.html
-
- Posts: 13754
- Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 22:26
That was not my recollection, and the link that Mohan posted confirms it - she received the SKN the year the SKA awards were instituted ('93). Talking about Smt. Mani Krishnaswami makes me wonder of she was the only 'product of' or 'person assocated with' kalAkSEtra to be recognized with the SKN? Tiger received it before kalAkSEtra was created.balusatya wrote:I think SKN .Mani krishnasamy was earlier SKA.(telling from memory)
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: 12 Jan 2007, 04:10
If we look at an age-wise distribution of possible vidwans, we will get an idea for the next 5 years or so.
>60 - TVG, Trichy Sankaran, TVR, VVS, Bombay Sisters, Karaikudi Mani, OST (??)
Then we are into the late 30 - 40+ age groups which will witness Ravikiran, Sudha, U Srinivas, Vijay Siva, Sanjay etc.
Going by Academy's history, TVG eventhough well deserving for a SKN, may be given the SKA.
Out of the above list, Bombay Sisters and Trichy Sankaran appear to be in contention in the short term than the others.
Ghanjira Harishankar is surely missed and could be included in the Hall of Fame.
>60 - TVG, Trichy Sankaran, TVR, VVS, Bombay Sisters, Karaikudi Mani, OST (??)
Then we are into the late 30 - 40+ age groups which will witness Ravikiran, Sudha, U Srinivas, Vijay Siva, Sanjay etc.
Going by Academy's history, TVG eventhough well deserving for a SKN, may be given the SKA.
Out of the above list, Bombay Sisters and Trichy Sankaran appear to be in contention in the short term than the others.
Ghanjira Harishankar is surely missed and could be included in the Hall of Fame.
-
- Posts: 1380
- Joined: 02 Sep 2007, 23:08
-
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: 05 Feb 2010, 10:50
-
- Posts: 2498
- Joined: 06 Feb 2010, 05:42
They finally honoured him this year.rbharath wrote:it has been asked and told many a times in the fora..ganesh_mourthy wrote:A serious query, Y is that I dont see Lalgudi Jayaraman in the list of people conferred SK. ??????????????
LGJ refused to accept kalanidhi when he was offered. They eventually gave it to DKJ that year.
-
- Posts: 1380
- Joined: 02 Sep 2007, 23:08
-
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: 05 Feb 2010, 10:50
ya, they gave him a special life time acheivement award. not the kalanidhiPunarvasu wrote:They finally honoured him this year.rbharath wrote:it has been asked and told many a times in the fora..ganesh_mourthy wrote:A serious query, Y is that I dont see Lalgudi Jayaraman in the list of people conferred SK. ??????????????
LGJ refused to accept kalanidhi when he was offered. They eventually gave it to DKJ that year.
-
- Posts: 645
- Joined: 05 Sep 2006, 10:09