pantula rama @ music academy - 2009-12-17 @4:00pm
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 06 Feb 2010, 00:53
rtp in mohana, grahabhedham at "ri" (brindavana saranga) and "pa" (hindola) for ragam, tanam and pallavi.
pallavi in chatusra ata.
1st lagu in mohanam,
2nd lagu - grahabhedham at "ga" - hindolam,
dhritams - grahabhedham at "ri" - brindavana saranga.
swaram on same lines.
pallavi in chatusra ata.
1st lagu in mohanam,
2nd lagu - grahabhedham at "ga" - hindolam,
dhritams - grahabhedham at "ri" - brindavana saranga.
swaram on same lines.
Last edited by mokshamugalada on 19 Dec 2009, 22:19, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 06 Feb 2010, 00:53
madhyamavati or brindavana saranga - janyas of same melakarta - depends on the treatment, swarasthanams being the same.
sadharana gandhara prayoga in brindavana saranga is not unknown too.
if one were to choose between durbar or nayaki, during a grahabhedham, it is up to the vidwan/vidushi to craft.
sadharana gandhara prayoga in brindavana saranga is not unknown too.
if one were to choose between durbar or nayaki, during a grahabhedham, it is up to the vidwan/vidushi to craft.
Last edited by mokshamugalada on 18 Dec 2009, 07:17, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 11 Nov 2005, 21:22
If that were the case, then it can't be Madhyamavathi either, because, Madhyamavathi has a trisruthi Rishabham; how would you produce a trisruthi rishabham during Grahabedham? This flexibility is all about our music.Jigyaasa wrote:GrahabhEda at ri should yield madhyamAvati, not brindAvana sAranga...
Lalitha
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 06 Feb 2010, 00:53
-
- Posts: 198
- Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 10:35
I am sorry to say, some of the discussions/opinion are really disappointing ! People give their opinion (mediocre etc.) without second thought and without any reasoning and substantiating it. The only justification is everyone has a right to give his/her opinion.
Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder.
Many seem to think they are experts in raga, laya like saint tyagaraja exclaimed here.
http://thyagaraja.sulekha.com/blog/post ... a-raga.htm
We seem to have many such experts on this forum !! God bless them with true knowledge !
Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder.
Many seem to think they are experts in raga, laya like saint tyagaraja exclaimed here.
http://thyagaraja.sulekha.com/blog/post ... a-raga.htm
We seem to have many such experts on this forum !! God bless them with true knowledge !
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: 07 Jun 2009, 18:40
This is an open ended statement and does not mean anything. What do you mean by 'fancy to rave about'appu wrote:I reached the sabha early with the hope of getting good seats for the Ravikiran concert. I attended Pantulu Rama's concert too. A very mediocre performance. Nothing fancy to rave about.
How many concerts have you attended or listened of this artist?
She is one of the outstanding artists of today and comes from a solid background in terms of her Gurus.
Forming an opinion without any substance is utter nonsense!!
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 18 Dec 2009, 21:45
I attended the same concert and I truly enjoyed Pantula Rama's performance . I liked the RTP though I cannot comment on the nuances of the Grihabhedam. This is the first time I listened to her and will try to attend one more during this season
Last edited by cpmadhu on 18 Dec 2009, 22:07, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 320
- Joined: 13 Dec 2007, 17:17
* She sings with classicism @ leisurely pace excelling in Raga bhava,depth& sahitya bhava.e.g.Bhairavi swarajathi-SS-Kamakshi.Ardanareswaram-Kumudakakriya-Dikshidhar.
* I think many people have still not heard her.
*I too was biased with her name till I attended her concert first during last season.
*M.S.N..Murthy (husband) violin was nice &supporting.
*Grahabedam RTP- is the talk of the town.good &hard excercise -deserves commendation.
*The ragams viz-Hindolam &Brindavana saranga became weaker in swara patterns not so much pleasing to hear as much clear as Mohanam.Brindavana saranga in my perception was only heard in R..S (Rannga).Probably one must get used to it more often.
* This domain is no longer exclusive to a few artists.
* I think many people have still not heard her.
*I too was biased with her name till I attended her concert first during last season.
*M.S.N..Murthy (husband) violin was nice &supporting.
*Grahabedam RTP- is the talk of the town.good &hard excercise -deserves commendation.
*The ragams viz-Hindolam &Brindavana saranga became weaker in swara patterns not so much pleasing to hear as much clear as Mohanam.Brindavana saranga in my perception was only heard in R..S (Rannga).Probably one must get used to it more often.
* This domain is no longer exclusive to a few artists.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 06 Feb 2010, 00:53
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 15:16
Her voice is mellifluous. she is unpredictable and that is what makes her spontaneous. After an elaborate bhairavi alapana, I expected a kriti and she landed a swarajati, "Kamakshi" and polished it off with just a neraval at Syamakrishna Sodari. She will be singing common or standard phrases and then all of a sudden some mindboggling flashes of phrases and briga.
Her concert is still ringing in my mind.
Her concert is still ringing in my mind.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 11:08
excellent vsarmaiitm, i concur with your statement,as you say many listeners discuss too much relating to the artists potentiality, technical intricacies of the concert and so on,as if they are authority in the subject, definitely every listener has the right to give his/her opinion, but many times they are unreasonably biased and irrational.vsarmaiitm wrote:I am sorry to say, some of the discussions/opinion are really disappointing ! People give their opinion (mediocre etc.) without second thought and without any reasoning and substantiating it. The only justification is everyone has a right to give his/her opinion.
Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder.
Many seem to think they are experts in raga, laya like saint tyagaraja exclaimed here.
[We seem to have many such experts on this forum !! God bless them with true knowledge !
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 16:56
pallavi in chatusra ata.
1st lagu in mohanam,
2nd lagu - grahabhedham at "pa" - hindolam,
dhritams - grahabhedham at "ri" - brindavana saranga.
swaram on same lines.
- During rAg & lyrics prsentation, one can hear the first rAg only.
During presentation of kalpana swarAs only, there would be distinct and crystal clear different rAgs due to graha bhEdam.
Lastly, is it graha or swara bhEdam? (graham never moves
)
1st lagu in mohanam,
2nd lagu - grahabhedham at "pa" - hindolam,
dhritams - grahabhedham at "ri" - brindavana saranga.
swaram on same lines.
- During rAg & lyrics prsentation, one can hear the first rAg only.
During presentation of kalpana swarAs only, there would be distinct and crystal clear different rAgs due to graha bhEdam.
Lastly, is it graha or swara bhEdam? (graham never moves

-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 11 Nov 2005, 21:22
Graham .. never moves; But graha bedham movesMember_First wrote:pallavi in chatusra ata.
1st lagu in mohanam,
2nd lagu - grahabhedham at "pa" - hindolam,
dhritams - grahabhedham at "ri" - brindavana saranga.
swaram on same lines.
- During rAg & lyrics prsentation, one can hear the first rAg only.
During presentation of kalpana swarAs only, there would be distinct and crystal clear different rAgs due to graha bhEdam.
Lastly, is it graha or swara bhEdam? (graham never moves)

Can someone kindly upload the RTP for the benefit of all those who are overseas?
THanks!
Lalitha
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 15:16
grahabedam at "ga" is hindolam, not "pa".mokshamugalada wrote:rtp in mohana, grahabhedham at "ri" (brindavana saranga) and "pa" (hindola) for ragam, tanam and pallavi.
pallavi in chatusra ata.
1st lagu in mohanam,
2nd lagu - grahabhedham at "pa" - hindolam,
dhritams - grahabhedham at "ri" - brindavana saranga.
swaram on same lines.
Ga Pa Da Sa Ri Ga as Sa small-ga small-ma small-da and small-ni is hindolam.
-
- Posts: 198
- Joined: 18 Mar 2006, 10:35
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 06 Feb 2010, 00:53
sorry - my bad - fingering problem in grahabhedham.lahari wrote:grahabedam at "ga" is hindolam, not "pa".mokshamugalada wrote:rtp in mohana, grahabhedham at "ri" (brindavana saranga) and "pa" (hindola) for ragam, tanam and pallavi.
pallavi in chatusra ata.
1st lagu in mohanam,
2nd lagu - grahabhedham at "pa" - hindolam,
dhritams - grahabhedham at "ri" - brindavana saranga.
swaram on same lines.
Ga Pa Da Sa Ri Ga as Sa small-ga small-ma small-da and small-ni is hindolam.

thanks for pointing out. i edited the post.
* heard that akashavani madras has recorded this program.
Last edited by mokshamugalada on 19 Dec 2009, 22:24, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 15:16
Violin - MSN Murthy, Mrdangam - Melakkaveri K Balaji, Morsing - R M Deenadayalu
1. Najeeva dhara - Bhilahari - Adi - Tyagarajar
2. Ardhanariswaram - Kumudakriya - Rupakam - Dikshitar
3. Raminchivarevarura - Subhoshini - Adi - Tyagrajar
4. Natanam Seyyum - Kedaragowla - Rupakam - Ramaswami Sivan
5. Kalala Nerchina - Deepakam - Adi - Tyagrajar
6. Kamakshi - Bhairavi - Misra Chapu - Subbaraya Sastri
7. RTP - Nannu palimpa - Mohanam - Graha bhedam: Hindolam, Br. Saranga, Chatusra Ata
8. Tillana - Kaanada
Review in Hindu, salient points:
1. Najeevadhara - starter didnot help takeoff of the concert
2. Too long kumudakriya alapana without favourable effect on concert impact, better as an academic exercise, overdose of kalpanaswaras
3. Bhairavi alapana lacked depth
4. RTP - hindolam was perciptible but br.saranga evasive; RTP showed virtuosity but lacked aesthetic appeal
5. All raga essays appeared more surface skimming whereas MSN Murthy's versions were more wholesome
1. Najeeva dhara - Bhilahari - Adi - Tyagarajar
2. Ardhanariswaram - Kumudakriya - Rupakam - Dikshitar
3. Raminchivarevarura - Subhoshini - Adi - Tyagrajar
4. Natanam Seyyum - Kedaragowla - Rupakam - Ramaswami Sivan
5. Kalala Nerchina - Deepakam - Adi - Tyagrajar
6. Kamakshi - Bhairavi - Misra Chapu - Subbaraya Sastri
7. RTP - Nannu palimpa - Mohanam - Graha bhedam: Hindolam, Br. Saranga, Chatusra Ata
8. Tillana - Kaanada
Review in Hindu, salient points:
1. Najeevadhara - starter didnot help takeoff of the concert
2. Too long kumudakriya alapana without favourable effect on concert impact, better as an academic exercise, overdose of kalpanaswaras
3. Bhairavi alapana lacked depth
4. RTP - hindolam was perciptible but br.saranga evasive; RTP showed virtuosity but lacked aesthetic appeal
5. All raga essays appeared more surface skimming whereas MSN Murthy's versions were more wholesome
Last edited by lahari on 22 Dec 2009, 11:02, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 16:56
-
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 19:16
Re:
[quote="Member_First"]Graham .. never moves; But graha bedham moves
You can listen to Dr. BMK's Saregamapadani Padeda-NataBhairavi in Two parts at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1duU1I7f ... re=related part I and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5JaD-td ... re=related Part II
providing excellent exposition of Grahabhedam by BMK.
This was a mix by me.
venkatakailasam
You can listen to Dr. BMK's Saregamapadani Padeda-NataBhairavi in Two parts at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1duU1I7f ... re=related part I and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5JaD-td ... re=related Part II
providing excellent exposition of Grahabhedam by BMK.
This was a mix by me.
venkatakailasam